Is the bh= value correct? AFAICT that would mean the headers have
been modified -- which can be the case if sendmail is involved and
it gets bogus input (e.g., from broken M$ MUA not using the proper
syntax).
BTW:
$ dkim-vrfy.pl < yourmessage
signature identity: @five-ten-sg.com
verify result: fai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2017-01-22 at 01:03 -0500, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Which MTA are you using?
Sendmail 8.16 with opendkim 2.10.3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEAREKAAYFAliEUs4ACgkQL6j7milTFsHk/gCfc0DeEJN+rCn9lTN2wdgCbFK
On 2017-01-21 at 17:57 -0800, Carl Byington wrote:
> About 10% of the mail from invista.com is failing validation. That mail
> has two signatures from from invista.com and kochind.onmicrosoft.com.
> Either both signatures validate, or they both fail. It seems there is
> something in the pphosted ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
About 10% of the mail from invista.com is failing validation. That mail
has two signatures from from invista.com and kochind.onmicrosoft.com.
Either both signatures validate, or they both fail. It seems there is
something in the pphosted mail flow th
