From: Hugh E Cruickshank via mailop Sent: February 5, 2024 16:52
> From: Scott Undercofler via mailop Sent: February 1, 2024 17:04
> >
> > The servers at shaw are configured to reject non-RFC bare linefeeds.
>
> Silly me I was looking for bare CRs as the error message advised. I
> will now go
I never was good at goodbye.
> On Feb 7, 2024, at 6:10 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
> wrote:
>
> Dnia 6.02.2024 o godz. 15:26:33 Aric Archebelle-Smith via mailop pisze:
>> Beginning in late January, we received user reports that mail was not
>> being delivered to Shaw.ca addresses. Users
Dnia 6.02.2024 o godz. 15:26:33 Aric Archebelle-Smith via mailop pisze:
> Beginning in late January, we received user reports that mail was not
> being delivered to Shaw.ca addresses. Users did not receive a
> non-delivery notification, but our logs show the following rejection:
> `status=sent
Replied of list. Sent from my iPhoneOn Feb 6, 2024, at 1:42 PM, Aric Archebelle-Smith via mailop wrote:Hi all,I'm also looking for a contact for Shaw.ca, but it is not related to the changes due to the SMTP smuggling vulnerability. I've reached out to postmas...@shaw.ca, but have not received a
Hi all,
I'm also looking for a contact for Shaw.ca, but it is not related to the
changes due to the SMTP smuggling vulnerability. I've reached out to
postmas...@shaw.ca, but have not received a response.
Beginning in late January, we received user reports that mail was not being
delivered to
> From: Scott Undercofler via mailop Sent: February 1, 2024 17:04
> >
> > The issue you´re seeing is directly related to SMTP smuggling which
> > was discussed on list ad nauseam about a month ago.
>
> I did see those but they did not appear to relate to anything we are
> doing so I did not read
From: Scott Undercofler via mailop Sent: February 1, 2024 17:04
>
> The issue you’re seeing is directly related to SMTP smuggling which
> was discussed on list ad nauseam about a month ago.
I did see those but they did not appear to relate to anything we are
doing so I did not read them in
On Thu, 1 Feb 2024, Scott Undercofler via mailop wrote:
I'm replying on list for visibility. The issue you’re seeing is
directly related to SMTP smuggling which was discussed on list ad
nauseam about a month ago. The servers at shaw are configured to
reject non-RFC bare linefeeds. Can you
On 02.02.2024 at 01:52 Hugh E Cruickshank via mailop wrote
> We are experiencing a problem with mail delivery to Shaw.ca. Since January
> 18th messages have been bounced with: 552 5.2.0 Message contains bare CR and
> is violating 822.bis section 2.3. We have tried to contact postmas...@shaw.ca
Im replying on list for visibility. The issue you’re seeing is directly related
to SMTP smuggling which was discussed on list ad nauseam about a month ago. The
servers at shaw are configured to reject non-RFC bare linefeeds. Can you
elaborate on why you’re sending them as they are not allowed.
Hi All:
We are experiencing a problem with mail delivery to Shaw.ca. Since
January 18th messages have been bounced with: 552 5.2.0 Message contains
bare CR and is violating 822.bis section 2.3. We have tried to contact
postmas...@shaw.ca but have not received any response yet. I was
wondering if
11 matches
Mail list logo
