Hi Riccardo,
> Am 06.12.2018 um 12:51 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
>
> Hi Dagobert!
>
>
> thank you, now, at least, I can rebuild the packages without getting
> conflicts with itself! :)
>
> Maybe talso the SunOS5.11 catalogs need to be purged?
Done:
dam@login
Hi Dagobert!
thank you, now, at least, I can rebuild the packages without getting
conflicts with itself! :)
Maybe talso the SunOS5.11 catalogs need to be purged?
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/pkgdb/srv4/181150ad712ffa53e81c6a4aa3ff91df/
When trying to upload, one of them gets an issue
Hi Riccardo,
Am 06.12.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Riccardo Mottola :
> perhaps there is also a permission issue? I think I need to repeat this for
> 5.9, since I still get:
Probably. Ire moved that also:
dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2/lib/python > ./safe_remove_package.py
Hi Dagobert,
On 12/3/18 1:34 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
You need to set PYTHONPATH. I just ran it:
dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2 > export PYTHONPATH=`pwd`
dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2 > cd lib/python
dam@login [login]:/home/dam/mgar/gar/v2/lib/python >
Hi Riccaardo,
Am 03.12.2018 um 12:09 schrieb Riccardo Mottola via maintainers
:
> let us take the "strong" route, remove traces of Performance, re-upload it
> again.
>
> Sorry for the delay, the last time I tried there were issues with the
> catalog, now I retried.
>
> Maciej (Matchek)
Hi,
let us take the "strong" route, remove traces of Performance, re-upload
it again.
Sorry for the delay, the last time I tried there were issues with the
catalog, now I retried.
Thank you!
Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote:
Use the following command to remove the package:
Riccardo Mottola escreveu no dia quarta, 31/10/2018
à(s) 23:28:
> No, it is not a widely used package... not at least in our tree, there
> are no dependencies on it (yet) as far as I know.
>
> Coud you remove it? can I do it? remove it from where?
>
Use the following command to remove the
Hi,
Maciej Bliziński wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:21:05AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
it says CSWPerformance1
this happened I think during a renaming where I changed case.. what a mess.
Maybe I should just rebuild and reissue the package and see if it helps,
after reinstalling it?
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 01:21:05AM +0200, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> it says CSWPerformance1
>
> this happened I think during a renaming where I changed case.. what a mess.
>
> Maybe I should just rebuild and reissue the package and see if it helps,
> after reinstalling it?
Normally when we
Hi Macjej.
Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote:
Try the following way to debug it:
1. Navigate to http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/
2. Click "buildfarm database" -- this is checkpkg's reference to the
state of the package catalogs
3. Click "catalog list". You will see table with various catalogs.
Try the following way to debug it:
1. Navigate to http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/
2. Click "buildfarm database" -- this is checkpkg's reference to the state
of the package catalogs
3. Click "catalog list". You will see table with various catalogs.
4. Click the unstable / SunOS5.9 (or SunOS5.10) /
Hi,
in WebServices I pull in a dependency on CSWperformance.
It is normal that it is not found because of binding, so I put in:
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices +=
surplus-dependency|CSWgnustep-make
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-webservices +=
surplus-dependency|CSWgnustep-base
12 matches
Mail list logo
