Re: amd53 on solaris 9

2016-12-06 Thread Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers
Hi Riccardo, Am 06.12.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Joerg Schilling wrote: >>> # Solaris 9 package does not contain 64 bit on i386 as we have a separate >>> Solaris 10 package >>> >SKIP_MODULATIONS-5.9 += isa-amd64 >>> >SKIP_MODULATIONS = $(SKIP_MODULATIONS-$(GAROSREL)) >> Solaris wi

Re: amd53 on solaris 9

2016-12-06 Thread Riccardo Mottola via maintainers
Hi, Joerg Schilling wrote: # Solaris 9 package does not contain 64 bit on i386 as we have a separate Solaris 10 package >SKIP_MODULATIONS-5.9 += isa-amd64 >SKIP_MODULATIONS = $(SKIP_MODULATIONS-$(GAROSREL)) Solaris with amd64 support first appeared in August 2004 - half a year before FCS of So

Re: amd53 on solaris 9

2016-12-05 Thread Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers
Hi Jörg, Am 05.12.2016 um 18:00 schrieb Joerg Schilling : > Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers wrote: > >> # Solaris 9 package does not contain 64 bit on i386 as we have a separate >> Solaris 10 package >> SKIP_MODULATIONS-5.9 += isa-amd64 >> SKIP_MODULATIONS = $(SKIP_MODULATIONS-$(GAROSREL))

Re: amd53 on solaris 9

2016-12-05 Thread Joerg Schilling via maintainers
Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers wrote: > # Solaris 9 package does not contain 64 bit on i386 as we have a separate > Solaris 10 package > SKIP_MODULATIONS-5.9 += isa-amd64 > SKIP_MODULATIONS = $(SKIP_MODULATIONS-$(GAROSREL)) Solaris with amd64 support first appeared in August 2004 - half a y

Re: amd53 on solaris 9

2016-12-05 Thread Dagobert Michelsen via maintainers
Hi Riccardo, Am 05.12.2016 um 16:44 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : > Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >>> I think I remember that you would "tweak" this since this build is useless >>> and at most there is a trick that on package assembly the 10x-amd64 >>> packages are copied in to satisfy package check, b