Hi Riccardo, Am 28.07.2017 um 02:04 schrieb Riccardo Mottola <rmott...@opencsw.org>: > I need libidn2 ... to update gnutls :( > Actually, I force it to use libidn 1 or disable it alltogether to see if I > get forward with it, but maybe it is not the best. > > we have libidn 1, but no libidn 2.... > should I start a new project? a branch? what would you prefer ?
What do you mean? We have Libidn 1.33 as CSWlibidn11 and Libidn2 0.10 as CSWlibidn2-0. Please note that Libidn and Libidn2 are completely different libraries, I didn’t get this either and asked Simon Josefsson and this is what he replied to me :-) Am 02.11.2016 um 09:41 schrieb Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org>: > Hi Dagobert, > > libidn and libidn2 are two different projects, they complement each > other rather then compete. libidn is for IDNA2003 and libidn2 is for > IDNA2008. For most purposes, libidn is what you want. And that is also the reason why we have CSWlibidn-dev and CSWlibidn2-dev. Best regards — Dago -- "You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to do something, and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
