On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 11:47:22PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:51:21 -0400
>>From: Christopher Faylor
>>
>>So, again, I'd like to go slowly and carefully with this change.
>
>I agree, and said I would wait, but I can't wait indefinitely.
>Eventually, if no one else cares
> Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 13:51:21 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> So, again, I'd like to go slowly and carefully with this change.
I agree, and said I would wait, but I can't wait indefinitely.
Eventually, if no one else cares to try these changes, they will go
in. If you
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 07:27:13PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:44:56 -0400
>>From: "William A. Hoffman"
>>
>>OK, so we got one more person to try it. So that is three (including
>>myself).
>>I am thinking that no one else is going to try it. Is that enough?
>>If not
> Really? I use VS 6 sometimes, and the feature is still
> there. What version dropped it?
It was dropped in VS7 (.NET). The new paradigm is to use devenv.exe by
passing it a solution file and a "configuration" (e.g. Debug or Release).
Unfortunately I'm not familiar with actually using devenv
> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:34:46 +0200
> From: Krzysztof Nosek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> of course calling cl.exe, link.exe and all the stuff directly _is_ an option.
> But, sometimes, when you use such tool as Visual Studio, you want to have
> projects (.vcproj) and solution
> Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 10:44:56 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> OK, so we got one more person to try it. So that is three (including
> myself).
> I am thinking that no one else is going to try it. Is that enough?
> If not, I will send another email.
I think anoth
> Why does one need to use devenv, anyway? Why not invoke cl.exe
> directly?
Eli,
of course calling cl.exe, link.exe and all the stuff directly _is_ an option.
But, sometimes, when you use such tool as Visual Studio, you want to have
projects (.vcproj) and solution files (.sln) configured so tha
At 11:11 PM 9/5/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:37:19 -0400
>> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> I have sent out a new message, and cross posted to this list so all can
>> see it.
>
>Thanks. Let's wait for a couple more weeks.
OK, so we got one more per
