Re: problems w/ make.

2006-09-25 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: > Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:15:49 -0400 > > Hi all, and once again much thanks for the help. Unfortunately the issue is > not the path. I tried by just copying all the files to c:\netirc and had the > same problem/. I've tried google but have not had any lck,.

Re: Re: problems w/ make.

2006-09-25 Thread humbe04
Hi all, and once again much thanks for the help. Unfortunately the issue is not the path. I tried by just copying all the files to c:\netirc and had the same problem/. I've tried google but have not had any lck,. Im also running cygwin, do you think that mit be an issue?>? below the paste

Re: problems w/ make.

2006-09-25 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 09:53:11 -0400 > From: Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], make-w32@gnu.org > >> > >> C:\Documents and Settings\John Blaze\Desktop\net-irc>make > >> makefile:306: *** multiple target patterns. Stop. > > > > There's something else at work here, because

Re: make for windows platform

2006-09-25 Thread josh garza
Hi Jon, I am not running the 64 bit version of windows server 2003, however I would be happy to help if there is a need. On 9/23/06, Jon Grant < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:27:23 -0500>> From: "josh garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello, I am interested

Re: problems w/ make.

2006-09-25 Thread Earnie Boyd
Quoting Eli Zaretskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:12:00 -0400 Hi, and thanks for the prompt response, ,. unfortunately i installed the new version of make and im still getting the same results C:\Documents and Settings\John Blaze\Deskt

Re: make for windows platform

2006-09-25 Thread Jon Grant
Hi, josh garza wrote: > Hi Jon, I am not running the 64 bit version of windows server 2003, however > I would be happy to help if there is a need. Great! Could you grab the sources, compile it with a 64bit compiler such as MS Visual C++ 2005 and test it using the test suite that would be great.