Re: Native WIN32 GNU make?

2007-05-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 09:20:54PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote: >Quoting Mark Txx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Any other "native" WIN32 solutions? such as mingw > >This is the one I would suggest. Along with MSYS (also supplied by >MinGW) which is a fork of an older version of Cygwin tailored to a >ming

Re: Native WIN32 GNU make?

2007-05-08 Thread Earnie Boyd
Quoting Mark Txx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Any other "native" WIN32 solutions? such as mingw This is the one I would suggest. Along with MSYS (also supplied by MinGW) which is a fork of an older version of Cygwin tailored to a mingw32 build environment. Earnie

RE: Native WIN32 GNU make?

2007-05-08 Thread Dave Korn
On 09 May 2007 00:47, Mark Txx wrote: > "Managing Projects with GNU Make" by Mecklenburg. Lately we have > experienced quite a few difficulties with our Windows builds with "Resource > temporarily unavailable". Only machines with a large amount of RAM can > build successfully. Research on the web

Re: Native WIN32 GNU make?

2007-05-08 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Has anybody used recent "native" WIN32 versions of GNU make with alternative shells such as sh.exe that comes in UnxUtils.zip? We do not use many UNIX commands beyond, sed, rm etc so we are not that demanding of our shell but I would hate use DOS. Are there any other open source shells for WIN32?

Native WIN32 GNU make?

2007-05-08 Thread Mark Txx
background: We currently use GNU make to build on Solaris, Linux and Windows XP + 2000. On Windows, we use cygwin and make 3.80 that is built to run with cygwin. We use a project build system that is similar to the one in discussed in "Managing Projects with GNU Make" by Mecklenburg. Lately