On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 12:41:16PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
>On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 11:26 -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>>I think this is a known limitation, that the job server is not
>>implemented on certain platforms. I googled a bit, and it seemed like
>>it has something to do with having or not h
Paul Smith wrote:
> Make jobserver doesn't use named pipes, at least not on POSIX systems.
> It does, however, require fully capable POSIX pipes, in particular ones
> that are inherited by/shared across multiple processes and which can be
> read from and written to by multiple processes simultaneo
Paul Smith wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 11:26 -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
I think this is a known limitation, that the job server is not
implemented on certain platforms. I googled a bit, and it seemed
like it has something to do with having or not having named pipes.
Perhaps some of the gnu
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 11:26 -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> I think this is a known limitation, that the job server is not
> implemented on certain platforms. I googled a bit, and it seemed
> like it has something to do with having or not having named pipes.
> Perhaps some of the gnu make folks c
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 08:05 -0700, Uffze wrote:
> I don't have a clue why on some lines make starts the tools directly
> (so they work), while on other lines the tools are started via the gnu
> shell (which uses different paths than window and results in the fact
> that they can't be found).
I can
Christopher Faylor wrote:
If there is a mingw jobserver issue, it sounds like a bug. Has it been
filed?
I think this is a known limitation, that the job server is not
implemented on certain platforms. I googled a bit, and it seemed like
it has something to do with having or not having nam
Hi,
first of all: I am quite new to make, so please be patient.
I am trying to port an existing gnu makefile from avr to dspic.
I am using make (v 3.81, native w32 application; i am not using cygwin) from
the Windows distribution of avr-gcc (WinAVR).
make starts the compiler and linker without a
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 09:36:25AM -0400, Bill Hoffman wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 06:27:29PM -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>>Thanks. And I understand the "no guarantee" issue, we ran into a
>>>problem with find.exe too a while back.
>>>
>>>I also understand their poi
