Re: FWD: HAVE_CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS

2010-01-08 Thread Hartmut Becker
The problems are a "rebuild problem" and a "suffixes problem". The "rebuild problem" shows on VMS with 3.81.90 without my recent patch; it does not show with 3.81: A newer source file is not found because of a case mismatch. My patch is VMS specific but I think the problem is in all HAVE_CASE_

Re: FWD: HAVE_CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS

2009-12-31 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Paul Smith > Cc: hartmut.bec...@hp.com, make-w32@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:08:29 -0500 > > The patches Hartmut sent in I've already applied to CVS, a month or so > ago. Any extra bits he mentions here (changes to strcmp etc. to make > things work) have not had patches sent alon

Re: FWD: HAVE_CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS

2009-12-31 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 21:12 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Paul Smith > > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:21:15 -0500 > > Cc: make-w32@gnu.org > > > > Hartmut: I'm forwarding this to the make-w32 list, which is where most > > of the folks who would know something about this are reading (I hope).

Re: FWD: HAVE_CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS

2009-12-31 Thread Eli Zaretskii
> From: Paul Smith > Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:21:15 -0500 > Cc: make-w32@gnu.org > > Hartmut: I'm forwarding this to the make-w32 list, which is where most > of the folks who would know something about this are reading (I hope). > I'm happy to comment on the feasibility (or not) of various solut

FWD: HAVE_CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS

2009-12-30 Thread Paul Smith
Hartmut: I'm forwarding this to the make-w32 list, which is where most of the folks who would know something about this are reading (I hope). I'm happy to comment on the feasibility (or not) of various solutions but I don't use this flag, or the systems that it's needed for, so I'm not sure what th