Fabrice GIRARDOT wrote:
Bill Hoffman wrote :
What shell/make are you using for windows and -j ?
Shell is cmd.exe and I'm runing an own-compiled Make
based on v3.81 that includes a windows-specific bug fix.
The bug fix deals with the -n option.
Thanks, Eli helped me figure it out. The wi
Bill Hoffman wrote :
What shell/make are you using for windows and -j ?
Shell is cmd.exe and I'm runing an own-compiled Make
based on v3.81 that includes a windows-specific bug fix.
The bug fix deals with the -n option.
Regards.
--
Fabrice GIRARDOT
___
Fabrice GIRARDOT wrote:
Marc Harbonne wrote :
Does the option make –j can improve the compilation time ?
Yes. On a Core2 Duo @ 2.13 GHz running Win2k with "only"
1 GB RAM, "make -j8" is about 40% than "make".
The "8" value was determined by differents tries.
You'll have to find with value b
Marc Harbonne wrote :
Does the option make –j can improve the compilation time ?
Yes. On a Core2 Duo @ 2.13 GHz running Win2k with "only"
1 GB RAM, "make -j8" is about 40% than "make".
The "8" value was determined by differents tries.
You'll have to find with value best fit your system
(CPUs
> Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:47:31 +0200
> From: "Marc Harbonne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I would like to know if I want to improve the compilation time of my
> project, I run over cygwin a standart gcc, the machine runs windows
> Server 2003, it is an quadro core machine.
>
> Does the option make
Hi All,
I would like to know if I want to improve the compilation time of my
project, I run over cygwin a standart gcc, the machine runs windows
Server 2003, it is an quadro core machine.
Does the option make -j can improve the compilation time ?
Is there a special make/gcc version for SMP ?
