At 11:34 AM 8/23/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:08:12 -0400
>> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> So, I guess you can say running mingw make from a cygwin shell is not
>> supported.
>
>I don't think the issue is with the shell from which you run Make, I
> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:08:12 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> So, I guess you can say running mingw make from a cygwin shell is not
> supported.
I don't think the issue is with the shell from which you run Make, I
think the issue is which sh.exe is being invoked by
Quoting Chris Sutcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>For the MSYS specific stuff, I think directing it to the the MSYS list
>would be an idea.
Yes.
So, is the mingw32-make not working with sh.exe from MSYS, MSYS specific?
Or should that not work, or should that be on the mingw list?
I'd take
Accidentally took this off the list (darn Gmail)
On 8/22/06, William A. Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 09:10 AM 8/22/2006, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>But if you can not run mingw make from an msys shell then what is the point of
>>looking for sh.exe in the PATH and setting it to be the
At 12:39 AM 8/22/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Seems like the old make used to create a .sh file to run the commands.
>
>That's what I suspected. I don't think we want to go back to the
>batch mode, since it's slower.
>
>So the solution still is to debug what happens on the Cygwin Bash
>side. I
> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:22:47 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> make 3.79.1
> c:/Hoffman/testmake/runit.exe "a.c" "b.c"
> CreateProcess(C:\cygwin\bin\sh.exe,C:/cygwin/bin/sh.exe
> c:\DOCUME~1\hoffman\LOCA
> LS~1\Temp\make28162.sh,...)
>
> make 3.81
> CreateProcess(C:
At 10:03 PM 8/21/2006, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>At 05:28 AM 8/21/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
>OK, I tried that and it does not work.
>
>// native make build with HAVE_CYGWIN_SHELL
>$ ../make-3.81/WinRel/make
>c:/Hoffman/testmake/runit.exe "a.c" "b.c"
>command line = {c:\Hoffman\testmake\runit.e
At 05:28 AM 8/21/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>I think we've already established that CreateProcess has nothing to do
>with the problem. I think the problem is that Bash (which receives
>the command line passed by CreateProcess) somehow removes the quotes
>from the command line before it passes it
> Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2006 10:30:25 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> It does work with quotes even though it does not need them. Maybe
> that is the trick with CreateProcess, you have to find the command
> and make sure it is in double quotes.
I thi
At 02:15 AM 8/19/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:53:38 -0400
>> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>>
>> runit:
>> "c:/hoffman/My Builds/CMakeDev/Tests/COnly/b/run.exe" "a.c" "b.c"
>> runit2:
>> c:/hoffman/My\ Builds/CMake
At 10:21 AM 8/19/2006, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Quoting "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>>I get a different failure when the shell is from msys:
>>
>>
>>c:/cygwin/bin/gcc.exe "a.c" "b.c"
>>CreateProcess(C:\msys\1.0\bin\sh.exe,C:/msys/1.0/bin/sh.exe -c
>>"c:/cygwin/bin/gcc.exe \"a.c\" \
Quoting "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I get a different failure when the shell is from msys:
c:/cygwin/bin/gcc.exe "a.c" "b.c"
CreateProcess(C:\msys\1.0\bin\sh.exe,C:/msys/1.0/bin/sh.exe -c
"c:/cygwin/bin/gcc.exe \"a.c\" \"b.c\"",...)
Putting child 0x00a73ca0 (broken) PID 4015
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:53:38 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> runit:
> "c:/hoffman/My Builds/CMakeDev/Tests/COnly/b/run.exe" "a.c" "b.c"
> runit2:
> c:/hoffman/My\ Builds/CMakeDev/Tests/COnly/b/run.exe "a.c" "b.c"
>
> So, if th
At 04:32 PM 8/18/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:50:03 -0400
>> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>>
>> >all:
>> >d:/full/path/to/rundump.exe "a.c" "b.c"
>> >
>> >d:/full/path/to/rundump.exe "a.c" "b.c"
>> >command line = {d:\f
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:50:03 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> >all:
> >d:/full/path/to/rundump.exe "a.c" "b.c"
> >
> >d:/full/path/to/rundump.exe "a.c" "b.c"
> >command line = {d:\full\path\to\rundump.exe a.c b.c}
> >argv[0] = {d:\ful
At 03:02 PM 8/18/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>I tried this program, and it verified that there's no problem on my
>system, where sh.exe is a native Windows shell. Here's what I get
>with this Makefile rule:
>
>all:
>d:/full/path/to/rundump.exe "a.c" "b.c"
>
>d:/full/path/to/rundump.exe "
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:00:55 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> >If you run this program from that makefile you will see that the command
> >line actually received by the program is
> >
> > c:\full\path\to\runDump.exe "a.c b.c"
> >
> >Note that
At 02:42 PM 8/18/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:56:56 -0400
>> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>>
>> >Please note that it is considered a shell character on _all_ systems
>> >when a Unixy shell is invoked. I believe the reason is tha
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:56:56 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> >Please note that it is considered a shell character on _all_ systems
> >when a Unixy shell is invoked. I believe the reason is that a Posix
> >shell removes the quotes from the com
At 12:56 PM 8/18/2006, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>OK, but there seems to be some extra work that needs to be done in
>CreateProcess to get the arguments correct.
Brad King who did the process execution stuff in cmake, had similar problems
with CreateProcess. I asked him to comment on the issue.
At 12:42 PM 8/18/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:58:00 -0400
>> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>>
>> Just noticed:
>>
>> static char sh_chars_sh[] = "#;\"*?[]&|<>(){}$`^";
>>
>> Note the \" This is in the #ifdef __MSDOS__ section
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:58:00 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> Just noticed:
>
> static char sh_chars_sh[] = "#;\"*?[]&|<>(){}$`^";
>
> Note the \" This is in the #ifdef __MSDOS__ section which I assume
> is on for mingw.
No, MinGW picks u
At 09:27 AM 8/18/2006, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Only for the "native" binary. It isn't a "bad habit" it is a necessary one.
Well changing command line options into full paths is an unfortunate side
effect at best.
-Bill
___
Make-w32 mailing list
Make
Quoting "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
But I want it to use sh.exe. The makefiles are mostly POSIX,
the only non-POSIX thing in them is the driver letter stuff.
C:/foo/bar.C. So cmd.exe does not like paths like that. Also,
Actually the newer versions of cmd.exe doesn't complai
> Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:40:55 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: make-w32@gnu.org
>
> Strange, If you look at the debug output I sent there is no shell redirection
> going on, but sh is being used.
Redirection is only one of the reasons. Quotes and shell wildcards
a
Just noticed:
static char sh_chars_sh[] = "#;\"*?[]&|<>(){}$`^";
Note the \" This is in the #ifdef __MSDOS__ section which I assume
is on for mingw. Why is " considered a shell character?
-Bill
___
Make-w32 mailing list
Make-w32@gnu.org
http://
At 07:07 AM 8/18/2006, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:37:37 -0400
>> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> >>Make 3.81 adds a feature whereby you can say "SHELL = cmd.exe" and
>> >>have it use CMD even if sh.exe is on your PATH. Previous versions of
>> >>Make did
> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:37:37 -0400
> From: "William A. Hoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >>Make 3.81 adds a feature whereby you can say "SHELL = cmd.exe" and
> >>have it use CMD even if sh.exe is on your PATH. Previous versions of
> >>Make didn't allow even that.
> >
> >This behavior was cont
At 05:38 PM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:21:41AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:02:30 -0400
>>> From: Bill Hoffman
>>>
>>> At 04:48 PM 8/17/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>> >I don't understand why MinGW's make should be using a
29 matches
Mail list logo
