In terms of creating a layer definition based on an extended feature class
that is a feature join on geometric properties, that is not possible.
But doing it at runtime "join" using spatial query operators, it is
possible.
- Jackie
Jamo wrote:
>
> Can't a spatial operator on the MgFilter be
Can't a spatial operator on the MgFilter be used? it would require coding if
it hasn't been done already ... or is it specific to each FDO ?
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Geometric-join-without-spatial-support-tp3208010p3222821.html
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing li
What version of Microstation are you using ?
If your using V8 you could try downloading Geographics for V8 which I belive
is free(for Bentley select subscribers) and export data to SHP files ready
for use in mapguide ? I'm not sure on the exact procedure but you may
need to create features an
When I posted this message, it was NO.
Now I have created some base layers for smooth navigation and on doing this
the result is very unpredictable. Sometimes, the layers are visible first
and then
the selection happens(which is good) and if I try doing the same selection
again
after going to ot
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Feature-Vertices-tp3205810p3221981.html
Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
mapguide-users mailing list
mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org
If GetGeometryType() return MgGeometryType.Polygon, then yes you can safely
cast it to a MgPolygon.
- Jackie
Tom Lazo wrote:
>
> Hi Jackie,
>
> Just one question, is the geometry cast just and (MgPolygon) geometry?,
> srry about my ignorance. n.n' . I think i should use the geometry's
> Boun
Hi Jackie,
Just one question, is the geometry cast just and (MgPolygon) geometry?, srry
about my ignorance. n.n' . I think i should use the geometry's Boundary
function. But i dunno how, i've looked everywhere without luck.
Plz help.
Thanks
Tom / Stygy
Jackie Ng wrote:
>
> Given a MgFeatu
Hi Jackie,
Just one question, is the geometry cast just and (MgPolygon) geometry?, srry
about my ignorance. n.n' . I think i should use the geometry's Boundary
function. But i dunno how, i've looked everywhere without luck.
Plz help.
Thanks
Tom / Stygy
Jackie Ng wrote:
>
> Given a MgFeatu
Seems like it could be a bug somewhere in Fusion and how it uses the
MapGuide API, there have been memory leaks found and fixed before
mostly related to using Feature Readers without properly closing
them. You can increase the memory limit for PHP in php.ini which you
should find in an Apa
May be something with Apache then and fusion then, checking that log may help.
It does work with IIS. Also Firebug may have an answer
Brian
-Original Message-
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of kevin_t
Sent: Tu
That's good, at least I know it's possible to load it with fusion layout.
The fusion layout does load if the SQL Server data is removed from the map.
MapGuide Enterprise 2010 and SQL Server 2008 are on different servers. Both
have installed:
Apache2
Windows Server 2003 R2
Berdel, Brian wrot
>From the Apache error log:
"PHP Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 67108864 bytes exhausted (tried to
allocate 34674 bytes) in C:\\Program
Files\\Autodesk\\MapGuideEnterprise2010\\WebServerExtensions\\www\\fusion\\common\\php\\Utilities.php
on line 42, referer: "
I opened the utilities.php a
Thanks - that was a very useful reply, actually! It leaves me wondering
why Fusion is so isolated from Mapguide, though. I mean, shouldn't bugs
like this in Fusion hold back a Mapguide release? To me, it should -
since Fusion comes with Mapguide (and so, if the Mapguide release is
good to go, t
I am not sure if there is a bug, but I am able to load SQL Server 2008 spatial
data into fusion with mapguide 2.0.2 and 2.1 beta and Enterprise 2010. Using
IIS XP and server 2003/ 2008. Does the same map load in fusion if you remove
the data?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: mapguide-us
I'm not sure what the timeframe for a MapGuide 2.1 release is, I
really hope we can fix up the fusion release to coincide or at least
be a LOT less broken for inclusion in 2.1. While I don't want to
delay MGOS 2.1 for Fusion or make their schedules interdependent, the
current sense I get i
Would that next fusion release make it into Mapguide 2.1 final, or are
we talking 2.2 now? Just trying to plan out whether or not I'll be
migrating to 2.1 (right now, it seems unlikely, unfortunately)...
Andrew
On 7/7/2009 3:16 PM, Paul Spencer wrote:
Thanks Brian ... I'll make sure this get
Thanks Brian ... I'll make sure this gets addressed as part of the
next (fusion) release.
Paul
On 7-Jul-09, at 2:05 PM, Berdel, Brian wrote:
There is an issue filed for it (it was filed by me #261), I just
wanted to add this to the discussion as it is a show stopper for me
to upgrade...I
There is an issue filed for it (it was filed by me #261), I just wanted to add
this to the discussion as it is a show stopper for me to upgrade...I thought
about breaking the maps up and giving them the ability to select different
maps, but some clients weren't too excited about the idea...
Bri
can you check your apache error log. I expect it is a bug in Fusion's
php code.
Cheers
Paul
On 7-Jul-09, at 1:51 PM, kevin_t wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem where my map in a fusion/flexible layout doesn't
load in my
browser if I have data from SQL Server 2008. It loads fine in the
Hi all,
I have a problem where my map in a fusion/flexible layout doesn't load in my
browser if I have data from SQL Server 2008. It loads fine in the basic
layout, so it is unlikely that it's a SQL Server issue. I am using MapGuide
Enterprise 2010 with SQL Server 2008 Trial version. The brows
argh - that shouldn't have changed, must be some difference in IE and
Firefox that we never noticed. What we really need is a method of
generating a single image that contains all the icons - or at least
all that we know about when the map loads - we are doing this with
mapserver and the l
Seems as though IE may load all of the images for the legend on page load, but
firefox does not load them until a folder is expanded. Again, this was not a
problem in Fusion 1.1.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.
Thanks Dave, but I have tried that and it has the same result with multiple
maps. Maps with < 20 or so load fine in IE. The maps I am using do have a
pretty deep structure as well so there are a lot of images to load. But it is
only in IE that the problem exists.
Brian
-Original Message
Increase the memory settings in your php.ini. 256MB should cover most maps.
Maps with 500+ layers may need up to 512. Maps with more than 750 layers may
need more.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Be
Hi, there are a few workarounds for this one:
1. Create a thematic layers based on TYPE_POLUTION and hard-code text into
the labels.
2. Create multiple layers filtered on TYPE_POLUTION
3. Create a lookup table in a database (i.e. Access) and join it to your
data for tooltips based on TYPE_POLUTION
Also, A map with a lot of layers (50 +) takes an extremely long time to load in
IE 7 & 8. No problem in FireFox and Chrome, but I receive the unresponsive
script warning in IE. I believe it has to do with the legend and the amount of
time IE takes generating it.
Brian
-Original Message---
Awesome fix! Thanks for that. I now have Firefox working without prompting
for a password!
thanks again
gordon
Benoit Begin wrote:
>
> The Firefox issue is fairly straightforward to fix, except for my lack of
> understanding of the actual cause of the issue.
>
> In ApplicationDefinition.js
If the Developer's Guide has a code sample for updates it's supposed to be the
same regardless of the provider. It's entirely possible you are experiencing a
bug.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Beh
A scale range change may cause things to slow down as other layers may need to
be enabled/disabled. Fusion is not likely to be any faster as it will have to
process the same scale change requests.
This is of course only speculation as to the cause.
Dave
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo
When you redirect, you must use the tempLayoutId variable:
String ag_NewUrl = "/mapguide/mapviewerajax/?WEBLAYOUT=" + Server.UrlEncode(tempLayoutId) +
"&SESSION=" + Server.UrlEncode(ag_sessionId);
Otherwise you will still use the non-modified version.
Regards, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S
Hi kenneth,
Thanks a lot for you code; i try it but it do not run (
http://patxi.mayol.free.fr/public/ag_default_maestro.aspx here is my code )
: the mapdefinition of layout is not change !
have you an idea ?
Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S wrote:
>
> Something like this would do it with Maestro
Hallo,
We found out, that the application works neither with ISA nor with SQIUD.
The tunnel is apparently aborted by the application. The DWF viewer in
between calls to the following:
POST http://blubb:443/mapguide/mapagent/mapagent.fcgi.
This seemingly terminates the SSL tunnel and causes the
I thik that you can't speed up your selection. The delay depends on many
things but the main reason is feature source (joins with database).
Are you using the tiled base layers?
From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Praveen
Thank you for your reply. Thank you so much.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S <
k...@geograf.dk> wrote:
> There is a basic (incomplete) Maestro guide here:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/mapguide/wiki/maestro/UserGuide
>
> Also, the MapGuide Developer Guide will explain mo
34 matches
Mail list logo
