I think this is a good idea, can you file enhancement request, this could be
exposed as a setting via serverconfig.ini
On 20 June 2010 05:31, gom wrote:
>
> As indicated in my original message I tried both PNG8 and JPG. I was just
> hoping that by adjusting the compression on JPG I could get a
As indicated in my original message I tried both PNG8 and JPG. I was just
hoping that by adjusting the compression on JPG I could get a compromise
between Quality and Size that would be helpful to performance while still
retaining better quality.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-or
Thank you Mike
Yes, I call that method with window.onload.
It's like Explorer can't reach fusion.js...??
Martin F
Mike Adair a écrit :
Just a guess because you haven't provided much information, but the
Fusion object will only be defined after all the script tags are
loaded. i.e. you need to c
have you tried PNG8 ?
On 19 June 2010 05:26, gom wrote:
>
> I have tried PNG8 and JPG as possible substitutes for the default PNG. In
> each case it renders the images unacceptably. Most notably smaller test
> labels become unreadable and general linework resolution is not great.
>
> Can I set
Bruce,
Thanks much for the info. That gives me a good place to start trying some
trade-off testing.
Do you have any thoughts on the Direct Connect part of my post? I have seen
a lot of discussion about using that method, but if my experience is any
indicator, I'm at a loss as to what the benefit
