Re: [mapguide-users] Moving to MGOS from AIMS

@morkl Right on cue! I was just dealing with ECW in 3.1 and already thought about switching to TIF or something else. Now, as I am new to the development thing, how can I use your patch?! Is it suitable for Windows? -- Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/MapGuide-Users-f4182607.html _

[mapguide-users] Fusion Error: [object Object] - Parse JSON - MapTip

Hi all, I have the "The custom error module does not recognize this error." Fusion Error especially while I selected a lot of features on the map... (400 features maybe...) and the Error will pop up... The error was shown as following image:

Re: [mapguide-users] Moving to MGOS from AIMS

If we could enable SDF support in a load procedure of Maestro- that would be great. It is a very fast way to store spatial data that doesn't change often. Also, Composite Symbology and Offset Symbology is currently much easier to use in Studio. Full disclosure tho - I am more cartographer than prog

Re: [mapguide-users] Moving to MGOS from AIMS

FWIW, I have been able to build GDAL 1.10 from FDO Trunk with ECW support (API version 5.0, SDK version 5.3) using MSVC2015 with some minor changes to nmake.opt (see attached patch). We don't have the required license so I haven't done any serious testing, but it seemed to work as a drop-in replac

Re: [mapguide-users] Moving to MGOS from AIMS

HI, there are alternatives to AIMS Industry Model Web (aka Topobase Web) . IM Web is quite powerfull and the alternatives I'm aware of do not cover it completly. But IM Web was (still is?) quite slow. We have been using TBVIEW for a few years now - it gives access to Map forms and more. https:/

[mapguide-users] Moving to MGOS from AIMS

Hi all, There is another part of AIMS that is going to disappear : The ex-Topobase features. Very powerful stuff developed with a strong DotNet API. The modules developed with this api is available to AutoDesk Map and AIMS. We are gone to missed that one. And i don't see any replacement :-( Bruno