[mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-05-07 Thread Mauricio Villablanca
Autodesk renamed Mapguide to IMS to indicate the server now supports technology available in Map3d namely Infrastructure Modeling. Support for that technology is likely to be nonavailable in the Open Source version for some time. So no, it's not just a fancy name change. -- View this message in

RE: [mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-25 Thread Ivan Miličević
To: MapGuide Users Mail List Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release? hehe! I know doesn't really matter, everyone calls the open source version MapGuide anyway discussion over :) On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Hans

Re: [mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-25 Thread Zac Spitzer
hehe! I know doesn't really matter, everyone calls the open source version MapGuide anyway discussion over :) On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Hans Milling wrote: > Zac, I think you just put your hand into a hornets nest, hehe. > > Hans... > > > -- > View this message in context: > http:/

[mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-25 Thread Hans Milling
Zac, I think you just put your hand into a hornets nest, hehe. Hans... -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Dropping-the-open-source-from-product-name-for-2-4-release-tp4913537p4916094.html Sent from the MapGuide Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: [mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-24 Thread Martin Morrison
users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of GordonL Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 11:42 AM To: mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org Subject: [mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release? Maybe that is true

[mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-24 Thread Jackie Ng
Changing the product name to something common and generic is a sure-fire recipe to kill your googlability/SEO. "MapGuide" is unique. "Infrastructure", "Map" and "Server" in any combination is not. The acronym is even worse. Why would you want to share an acronym with a dead ESRI product of all th

RE: [mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-24 Thread Trevor Wekel
[mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release? I think a product name change is a waste of developer cycles that are better spent on more productive things. - Jackie -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Dropping-

[mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-24 Thread GordonL
Maybe that is true, when Autodesk realizes "IMS" has the same connotation as "Ford Pinto" or "Datsun 200B", it may revert back to MapGuide. -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Dropping-the-open-source-from-product-name-for-2-4-release-tp4913537p4913833.html Sent

[mapguide-users] Re: Dropping the "open source" from product name for 2.4 release?

2012-04-24 Thread Jackie Ng
I think a product name change is a waste of developer cycles that are better spent on more productive things. - Jackie -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Dropping-the-open-source-from-product-name-for-2-4-release-tp4913537p4913791.html Sent from the MapGuide Use