RE: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

To: MapGuide Users Mail List Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better?? what would you be editing with other wise? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Ivan Milicevic wrote: > Guy's, I'm not thinking about joining :) It's totally lame! > > What about editing geometry in SQ

Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

clue about it. > > -Original Message- > From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org > [mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of irwan > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:18 AM > To: mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org > Subject: Re: [mapguide-users

RE: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of irwan Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:18 AM To: mapguide-users@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better?? ivan, i agree with you. sdf performance is much better than read layer geometry from database. but if your requirement need an up-to-m

Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >>> [mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer >>> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:22 AM >>> To: MapGuide Users Mail List >>> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better?? >>> >>>

Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

ver about 10-20 users per server. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org >> [mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer >> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:22 AM >> To: MapGuide Users Mail List >

Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

We server about 10-20 users per server. > > -Original Message- > From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org > [mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 9:22 AM > To: MapGuide Users Mail List > Subject: R

RE: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

08, 2009 9:22 AM To: MapGuide Users Mail List Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better?? a pure sdf solution generally speaking will be better, but a database is way easier to manage how many users are you serving? z On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ivan Milicevic wrote: > Zac, >

Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

never tried to transport all my layer into database yet..but do you think it is more reliable than using sdf that joined with database itself? i do have 1 layer contain 100 poles that joined to databse but the performance is very poor. a lot of bad comments about joining in this forum indeed -- V

Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

riginal Message- > From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org > [mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 8:45 AM > To: MapGuide Users Mail List > Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better?? > > if your j

RE: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better?? if your joining, do in the database, mapguide joins aren't much chop a database will scale and be faster and more reliable... does all depend on your data of course and how much you have On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:24 PM, irwan wrote: > > Hi guy

Re: [mapguide-users] Which is better??

if your joining, do in the database, mapguide joins aren't much chop a database will scale and be faster and more reliable... does all depend on your data of course and how much you have On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:24 PM, irwan wrote: > > Hi guyss. here is the situation.. > > 1. Publish a pole lay

[mapguide-users] Which is better??

Hi guyss. here is the situation.. 1. Publish a pole layer (sdf file) that joined with attribute from database using MGStudio 2. Publish both pole attribute and spatial data from database (store pole geomtery coordinate) using MGStuido >From your point of view, which one comes up with a better pe