latest code, so it would be
>> up to someone who needs this to check it in and test it, or I can merge it
>> in without testing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Traian
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
>> [m
Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
effect
Hi Haris,
I fixed the refcount and removed the global mutex on the GDAL side (there is
still one on MapGuide connection pool side).
The changes I had made to MapGuide were in order to allow opening of mult
, May 29, 2011 5:25 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
effect
Hi Traian
We are trying to use MG OS 2.2 with GDAL and it is not stable.
Right now at customer sites we are using 2.1 with GDAL with patches we made
some time ago
...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Haris Kurtagic
Sent: May 29, 2011 3:25 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
effect
Hi Traian
We are trying to use MG OS 2.2 with GDAL and it is not stable.
Right
lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Zac Spitzer
> Sent: Saturday, May 28, 2011 2:38 AM
>
> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
> Subject: Re: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
> effect
>
>
>
> That patch soun
Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
effect
Hi Gunter,
Since only one raster feature source can be loaded at any given time, you may
up with some additional load overhead if your config.xml (raster catalog)
documents are fairly large. As
> Traian
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> mapguide-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Trevor Wekel
> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:26 AM
> To: MapGuide Users Mail List
> Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] RE:
, 2011 12:26 AM
To: MapGuide Users Mail List
Subject: RE: [mapguide-users] RE: Changing custom PoolSize for GDAL has no
effect
Hi Gunter,
Since only one raster feature source can be loaded at any given time, you may
up with some additional load overhead if your config.xml (raster catalog
Hi Gunter,
Since only one raster feature source can be loaded at any given time, you may
up with some additional load overhead if your config.xml (raster catalog)
documents are fairly large. As far as I know, the config.xml information will
only remain cached for the lifetime of the connection
