No but you could create a new (temporary) column with the values that are to
be used in the labels then label on that temporary column
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron Crum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Carlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "MapInfo-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
I tried it in a helicopter about 18 months ago and found a similar problem
although from memory, I thought the lag was even greater.
I know that the update interval was not the problem, I checked that out
fairly early in the piece (helicopter hovering while I tap madly on the
laptop.
I assumed
I cant see how the precision should be causing you that problem, if there is
a node for another polygon there, the node should snap to it happily. It
seems more likely that they do not appear to share the boundary because one
polygon has fewer nodes on that boundary than the other or they are no
Find a good bitmap handler and rotate the raw image back so that it appears
correctly oriennted on screen, then re-register
Control points are so that MapInfo can line your tables up with the bitmap,
not the other way around I'm afraid
The alternative is to scan your map in smaller chunks that y
- Original Message -
From: "Trey Pattillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MapInfo List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: MI-L metric v. non metric
SNIP-
> I prefer 20010226, it sorts correctly.
20th January 226? What are you mapping, roman t
Consider creating a buffer the correct distance out from your line and
converting it to a polyline
You can then make the choice as to whether you use a portion of the buffer
in situ or simply duplicate your original line and shift it to the position
now marked by the buffer.
Another alternative
Trey and John, you have my support 100%, I have presumed that
I have no use for the MB Coder because I haven't access to MB (feel free to
correct me if I am wrong), but I have watched the thread jealously and with
great interest and continue to marvel at the amount of work Trey is putting int
Export them to a MIF
It helps to have each one identified in a Fiel;d, you can then use the
accompanying MID to idenfity which is which (the order is the same)
Cheers
Russ
- Original Message -
From: "Allan Jonathan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2
If you are putting the text on a layer (ie. in a table) that is visible in
other mapper windows the changes to that table will be reflected in each
mapper that the table is visible in (except for the cosmetic layer which is
exclusive to the individual mapper). Could you be putting your map label