The problem I submitted to the list was that when I was trying to position
exactly a MIG grid during its creation as a thematic map by adding to the
data 2 points representing the bounds I wanted, the resulting MIG would
contain one more row and column than necessary.
It works as designed, simply
-Original Message-
From: Jacques Paris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 3 March 2004 23:51
To: MIL
Subject: MI-L sum : MIG fantasies
I put SUM in the subject but it is a misnomer because SUM = 0 (ziltch)
As I had already touched on the subject at least 2 years back
I put SUM in the subject but it is a misnomer because SUM = 0 (ziltch)
As I had already touched on the subject at least 2 years back and got the
same (lack of) reaction I have to choose between two possibilities
1 - that whatever I say is never challenged because I know the subject and
nothing
I missed your monday's e-mail, otherwise I would react earlier. So let the
Sum be 0+1:
In my work (geology) I am dealing with Mapinfo and grids daily. I am
creating MIGs using Grid Analyser and never experienced problems related
to gid dimensions: what I set I always get. But what irritates me
Dear Jacques,
I think that many MI users in this list are using VM and therefore their
knowledge of What can I do with MIG grid is limited ONLY to GridEngine.
This is because of MapInfo's policy. From version 5.5, there has been no
improvement in MapInfo's grid engine, neither in functions on
