In reply to your question/statement - both yes and no. You are making the
classic mistake of using data for something that it was never intended to be
used for, and then wondering why it does not give you the answers that you
think it should.
The AP act began circa 1972 (hand drafted maps o
Caryn,
You could try this link to California Department of Conservation's Division
of Mines and Geology
http://www.consrv.ca.gov/dmg/eq-index.htm
-Original Message-
From: Caryn Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 9:23 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 4:54 PM
Subject: Fw: MI-L California Seismic Information , repy
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: < >
> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2001 2:38 PM
> Subject: Re: MI-L California
On the precise location issue. That is a big problem for everyone. the
problem is that the original mapping was at one scale (and was designed to
work at a that scale), but converting it to digital format allows for false
accuracy. For example. The AP maps (active fault trace maps) were ori
