Hi Tim,
Integrated mapping requires, that MapInfo is installed on the computer,
so it isn't cheaper than using mapX, but offers other possiblities.
MapInfo Runtime should also be an option.
If you are truly locked into that kind of hardware, .NET is not an
option. With 32 MB RAM I don't even
To: Mapinfo-L
Subject: Re: MI-L MapXtreme and C++
Hi Tim,
Integrated mapping requires, that MapInfo is installed on the computer,
so it isn't cheaper than using mapX, but offers other possiblities.
MapInfo Runtime should also be an option.
If you are truly locked into that kind of hardware, .NET
-L
Subject: RE: MI-L MapXtreme and C++
Thanks Uffe,
We have a new system which replaces the old 133MHz system which could
run MapXtreme (1GHz, 256MB), we just want to support the old system, but
it's looking more like this is not possible.
I guess we have no choice but to move up to MapXtreme
, support for linked ECW images,
...
www.manifold.net
Cheers!
Ian Thomas
GeoSciSoft - Perth, Australia
-Original Message-
From: Tim Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 January 2005 9:22 PM
To: Mapinfo-L
Subject: RE: MI-L MapXtreme and C++
Thanks Uffe,
We have a new
