[jira] [Resolved] (MAPREDUCE-4933) MR1 final merge asks for length of file it just wrote before flushing it

2013-02-27 Thread Sandy Ryza (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sandy Ryza resolved MAPREDUCE-4933. --- Resolution: Fixed > MR1 final merge asks for length of file it just wrote before flus

RE: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-02-27 Thread Ivan Mitic
+1 (non-binding) I am really glad to see this happening! As people already mentioned, this has been a great engineering effort involving many people! Folks raised some valid concerns below and I thought it would be good to share my 2 cents. In my opinion, we don't have to solve all these probl

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-02-27 Thread Todd Lipcon
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > With that we need to decide how our precommit process looks. > My inclination is to wait for +1 from precommit builds on > both the platforms to ensure no issues are introduced. > Thoughts? > > 2. Feature development impact > Some questions

[jira] [Resolved] (MAPREDUCE-4831) Task commit can occur more than once due to AM retries

2013-02-27 Thread Jason Lowe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Lowe resolved MAPREDUCE-4831. --- Resolution: Not A Problem After discussing this at length with Bobby, we came to the conc

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-02-27 Thread Suresh Srinivas
Thanks for raising good questions. Currently the merge patch passes all the tests on Linux, hence the proposal for merging the patch to trunk. But as Bobby, Harsh and Eli pointed out, before declaring support for Windows, we need the discussion on the following: 1. Precommit and development proce

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-5036) Default shuffle handler port should not be 8080

2013-02-27 Thread Sandy Ryza (JIRA)
Sandy Ryza created MAPREDUCE-5036: - Summary: Default shuffle handler port should not be 8080 Key: MAPREDUCE-5036 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5036 Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-02-27 Thread Eli Collins
Bobby raises some good questions. A related one, since most current developers won't add Windows support for new features that are platform specific is it assumed that Windows development will either lag or will people actively work on keeping Windows up with the latest? And vice versa in case Wi

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-02-27 Thread Harsh J
Similar personal concern as Robert: Does this bring about a development process change? Do new features all need to work on Windows as well to go into trunk (i.e. immediately or eventually, either way requires a new policy for all of us devs)? Not that anyone would be avoiding doing that, I just as

[jira] [Resolved] (MAPREDUCE-5035) Update MR1 memory configuration docs

2013-02-27 Thread Tom White (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom White resolved MAPREDUCE-5035. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I just committed

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

2013-02-27 Thread Robert Evans
After this is merged in is Windows still going to be a second class citizen but happens to work for more than just development or is it a fully supported platform where if something breaks it can block a release? How do we as a community intend to keep Windows support from breaking? We don't have

[jira] [Created] (MAPREDUCE-5035) Update MR1 memory configuration docs

2013-02-27 Thread Tom White (JIRA)
Tom White created MAPREDUCE-5035: Summary: Update MR1 memory configuration docs Key: MAPREDUCE-5035 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5035 Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce Issue