Hi Tsuyoshi,
I just checked Hadoop wiki on HowToContribute and it points ProtocolBuffer
things to YARN Readme which is already updated to 2.5.0 now.
Thanks,
Junping
- Original Message -
From: Tsuyoshi OZAWA ozawa.tsuyo...@gmail.com
To: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/1520/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 31878 lines...]
Running
We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited understanding,
this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we not fix it in
subsequent bug-fix releases?
I do see a lot of follow up releases to 2.1.0. Getting this release out will
help downstream projects start
Not sure about your final intention, but a new FileSystem impl
wrapping/composing the underlying file system should work. No?
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Jay Vyas wrote:
Hi mapred:
I'd like to proxy calls made to the FileSystem's created during mapreduce
jobs.
However,
Well I want the method calls to be wrapped dynamically, rather than
individually wrapping each one of them and manually wrapping the calls.
That way the Wrapping file system can be used with any underlying
FileSystem base from any version .
If manually wrapping the underlying FileSystem, then
That makes sense too.
On Aug 16, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
We need to make a call on what blockers will be. From my limited
understanding, this doesn't seem like a API or a compatibility issue. Can we
not fix it in subsequent bug-fix
It's your call, Arun. I.e. as long you believe rc2 meets the expectations and
objectives of 2.1.0-beta.
Kihwal
From: Arun Murthy a...@hortonworks.com
To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org common-...@hadoop.apache.org
Cc: Kihwal Lee kih...@yahoo-inc.com;
I've changed the target version of HADOOP-9880 to 2.1.1. Please change it
back, if you feel that it needs to be in 2.1.0-beta.
Kihwal
From: Kihwal Lee kih...@yahoo-inc.com
To: Arun Murthy a...@hortonworks.com; common-...@hadoop.apache.org
What are the downsides of getting this fix into the 2.1? It appears
that the fix is pretty isolated and well understood.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Kihwal Lee kih...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I've changed the target version of HADOOP-9880 to 2.1.1. Please change it
Yep, there are quite a number of such fixes in 2.1.1 ATM, I think it will serve
us better to get 2.1.0 out and then quickly turn around to make 2.1.1.
My current plan is to start work on 2.1.1 right after this release gets
complete… hopefully next week.
thanks,
Arun
On Aug 16, 2013, at 4:36
Gang,
I spent time looking through changes slated for hadoop-2.1.1-beta and things
look fairly contained (~10 or so changes for each of Common, HDFS, YARN
MapReduce).
Can I, henceforth, request committers to exercise large dollops of caution
when committing to branch-2.1-beta? This way I
11 matches
Mail list logo
