Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.11

2014-06-25 Thread Jason Lowe
+1 (binding) - Verified signatures and digests - Deployed binary tarball to a single-node cluster and ran some MR example jobs - Built from source, deployed to a single-node cluster and ran some MR example jobs Jason On 06/19/2014 10:14 AM, Thomas Graves wrote: Hey Everyone, There have

Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk - Build # 1812 - Still Failing

2014-06-25 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/1812/ ### ## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE ### [...truncated 35162 lines...] [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO]

Re: Moving to JDK7, JDK8 and new major releases

2014-06-25 Thread Owen O'Malley
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote: After reading this thread and thinking a bit about it, I think it should be OK such move up to JDK7 in Hadoop I agree with Alejandro. Changing minimum JDKs is not an incompatible change and is fine in the 2 branch.

Re: [VOTE] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7

2014-06-25 Thread Arpit Agarwal
+1 Arpit On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, As discussed, I'd like to call a vote on changing our by-laws to change release votes from 7 days to 5. I've attached the change to by-laws I'm proposing. Please vote, the vote will the usual

Re: [VOTE] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7

2014-06-25 Thread Giridharan Kesavan
+1 -giri On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Arpit Agarwal aagar...@hortonworks.com wrote: +1 Arpit On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, As discussed, I'd like to call a vote on changing our by-laws to change release votes from 7 days

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.11

2014-06-25 Thread Karthik Kambatla
+1 (non-binding) Stood up a pseudo-dist cluster and ran a few MR jobs. On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jason Lowe jl...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid wrote: +1 (binding) - Verified signatures and digests - Deployed binary tarball to a single-node cluster and ran some MR example jobs - Built

Re: Moving to JDK7, JDK8 and new major releases

2014-06-25 Thread Chris Nauroth
I'm also +1 for getting us to JDK7 within the 2.x line after reading the proposals and catching up on the discussion in this thread. Has anyone yet considered how to coordinate this change with downstream projects? Would we request downstream projects to upgrade to JDK7 first before we make the

Re: [VOTE] Change by-laws on release votes: 5 days instead of 7

2014-06-25 Thread Kihwal Lee
+1 (binding) Kihwal On 6/24/14, 3:53 AM, Arun C Murthy a...@hortonworks.com wrote: Folks, As discussed, I'd like to call a vote on changing our by-laws to change release votes from 7 days to 5. I've attached the change to by-laws I'm proposing. Please vote, the vote will the usual period

Re: Moving to JDK7, JDK8 and new major releases

2014-06-25 Thread Alejandro Abdelnur
Chris, Compiling with jdk7 and doing javac -target 1.6 is not sufficient, you are still using jdk7 libraries and you could use new APIs, thus breaking jdk6 both at compile and runtime. you need to compile with jdk6 to ensure you are not running into that scenario. that is why i was suggesting

Re: Moving to JDK7, JDK8 and new major releases

2014-06-25 Thread Akira AJISAKA
+1 (non-binding) for 2.5 to be the last release to ensure JDK6. My higher-level goal though is to avoid going through this same pain again when JDK7 goes EOL. I'd like to do a JDK8-based release before then for this reason. This is why I suggested skipping an intermediate 2.x+JDK7 release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.1

2014-06-25 Thread Ravi Prakash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Built and deployed clusters on Amazon. Ran a basic test suite. Thanks Arun On 06/25/14 17:11, Akira AJISAKA wrote: Thanks Arun for another RC! I'm +1 (non-binding) for RC2. HDFS-6527 should be reverted because the issue is only in 2.5 and