See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2440/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 33295 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8/497/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 10787 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.mapre
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8/496/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 11252 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.mapre
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2439/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 33300 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8/495/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 11368 lines...]
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Erro
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2438/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 33020 lines...]
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote:
> Do you have any concern about this? I’ve not
> tested with HBase yet.
>
We've been running JDK 8u60 in production with Hadoop 2.6.X and HBase for
quite a while. Everything has been very stable for us. We're running and
compiling with jdk8.
>
> > On 7 Oct 2015, at 17:23, Andrew Wang wrote:
> >
> > We've been supporting JDK8 as a runtime for CDH5 for a while now (meaning
> > the full stack including HBase), so I agree that we're good there.
> >
>
>
> with Kerberos on?
>
> Yea, I haven't been that involved with our internal JDK validat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2230?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Konstantin Boudnik resolved MAPREDUCE-2230.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Release Note: AOP tests were removed from the
> On 7 Oct 2015, at 17:23, Andrew Wang wrote:
>
> We've been supporting JDK8 as a runtime for CDH5 for a while now (meaning
> the full stack including HBase), so I agree that we're good there.
>
with Kerberos on?
> I'm against dropping JDK7 support though in branch-2.
+1. We're only talking
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8/494/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 11373 lines...]
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Erro
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2437/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 33302 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.mapred.Tes
We've been supporting JDK8 as a runtime for CDH5 for a while now (meaning
the full stack including HBase), so I agree that we're good there.
I'm against dropping JDK7 support though in branch-2. Even bumping
dependency versions scares me, since it often leads to downstream pain. Any
comment about
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2436/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 33313 lines...]
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8/493/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 10709 lines...]
at
com.sun.jersey.test
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk-Java8/492/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 11367 lines...]
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Erro
> On 7 Oct 2015, at 07:29, Masatake Iwasaki wrote:
>
> Thanks for clear summary, Tsuyoshi.
>
> I read some related past discussions.
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/MovingToJdk7and8
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/uOzYtGSiCs1acRnh
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/uOzYthdWJqpGdSZ1
>
> Though th
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2435/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 33579 lines...]
TestAMWebServicesJobs.:116->Jerse
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2434/
###
## LAST 60 LINES OF THE CONSOLE
###
[...truncated 33652 lines...]
Running org.apache.hadoop.conf.TestN
19 matches
Mail list logo