We could consider porting a limited number of critical fixes to branch-2.8.
We'd need to be judicious about it so as not to prolong that cycle, however.
Sangjin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 6:16 AM, Eric Payne wrote:
> How do we come to a resolution regarding whether or not re-cut branch-2.8
> or r
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:56 PM, Karthik Kambatla
wrote:
> If there is interest in releasing off of branch-2.8, we should definitely
> do that. As Sangjin mentioned, there might be value in doing 2.9 off
> branch-2 too.
>
> How do we go about maintenance releases along those minor lines, and when
For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-ppc/151/
[Nov 9, 2016 1:02:40 PM] (aajisaka) HADOOP-13800. Remove unused
HADOOP_AUDIT_LOGGER from hadoop-env.sh.
[Nov 9, 2016 3:15:11 PM] (Arun Suresh) YARN-5833. Addendum patch to include
missing changes to yarn-d
For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/221/
[Nov 9, 2016 8:11:25 AM] (Arun Suresh) YARN-5823. Update NMTokens in case of
requests with only opportunistic
[Nov 9, 2016 12:34:40 PM] (rkanter) YARN-5736. YARN container executor config
does not handle w
How do we come to a resolution regarding whether or not re-cut branch-2.8 or
release it as it is (after fixing blockers)?
There are some things in branch-2 that I would like to pull back into
branch-2.8, so a resolution to this question will affect how I proceed.
Thanks,-Eric
From: Karthik
