+1
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, 03:54 Wangda Tan, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to positive feedbacks from the thread [1]
>
> This is vote thread to start a new subproject named "hadoop-submarine"
> which follows the release process already established for ozone.
>
> The vote runs for usual 7 days, whic
+1 . Thanks Wangda.
- Sunil
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 3:54 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to positive feedbacks from the thread [1]
>
> This is vote thread to start a new subproject named "hadoop-submarine"
> which follows the release process already established for ozone.
>
> The vo
+1
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019, 09:51 Rohith Sharma K S +1
>
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019, 3:54 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > According to positive feedbacks from the thread [1]
> >
> > This is vote thread to start a new subproject named "hadoop-submarine"
> > which follows the release process alre
+1
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019, 3:54 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> According to positive feedbacks from the thread [1]
>
> This is vote thread to start a new subproject named "hadoop-submarine"
> which follows the release process already established for ozone.
>
> The vote runs for usual 7 days, wh
+1. Thanks Wangda.
Jonathan Hung
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:25 PM Dinesh Chitlangia <
dchitlan...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding), thanks Wangda for organizing this.
>
> Regards,
> Dinesh
>
>
>
> On 2/1/19, 5:24 PM, "Wangda Tan" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> According to positive fee
Hi all,
According to positive feedbacks from the thread [1]
This is vote thread to start a new subproject named "hadoop-submarine"
which follows the release process already established for ozone.
The vote runs for usual 7 days, which ends at Feb 8th 5 PM PDT.
Thanks,
Wangda Tan
[1]
https://lis
Eric,
Thanks for your reconsideration. We will definitely try best to not break
compatibilities, etc. like how we did to other components!
Really appreciate everybody's support, thoughts, suggestions shared on this
thread. Given the discussion went very positive, I will go ahead to send a
voting t
+1.
I like the idea.
For me, submarine/ML-job-execution seems to be a natural extension of
the existing Hadoop/Yarn capabilities.
And like the proposed project structure / release lifecycle, too. I
think it's better to be more modularized but keep the development in the
same project. IMHO it wor
This is a great proposal. +1.
Thanks,
Hanisha
On 2/1/19, 11:04 AM, "Bharat Viswanadham" wrote:
>Thank You Wangda for driving this discussion.
>+1 for a separate release for submarine.
>Having own release cadence will help iterate the project to grow at a faster
>pace and also get the n
+1, Thanks for driving this. With rise of use cases running ML along with
traditional applications this will be of great help.
Thanks,
Ajay
On 2/1/19, 10:49 AM, "Suma Shivaprasad" wrote:
+1. Thanks for bringing this up Wangda.
Makes sense to have Submarine follow its own relea
+1, thanks for bringing this up, Wangda. This will help expanding the Hadoop
ecosystem by supporting new AI/ML workloads.
Thanks,
Xiaoyu
On 2/1/19, 10:58 AM, "Dinesh Chitlangia" wrote:
+1 This is a fantastic recommendation given the increasing interest in ML
across the globe.
Th
Thanks everyone for sharing thoughts!
Eric, appreciate your suggestions. But there are many examples to have
separate releases, like Hive's storage API, OZone, etc. For loosely coupled
sub-projects, it gonna be great (at least for most of the users) to have
separate releases so new features can be
+1. Thanks for bringing this up Wangda.
Makes sense to have Submarine follow its own release cadence given the good
momentum/adoption so far. Also, making it run with older versions of Hadoop
would drive higher adoption.
Suma
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:40 AM Eric Yang wrote:
> Submarine is an ap
+1
Does Submarine support Jupyter?
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:54 AM Zhe Zhang wrote:
> +1 on the proposal and looking forward to the progress of the project!
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:51 PM Weiwei Yang wrote:
>
> > Thanks for proposing this Wangda, my +1 as well.
> > It is amazing to see th
+1 on the proposal and looking forward to the progress of the project!
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:51 PM Weiwei Yang wrote:
> Thanks for proposing this Wangda, my +1 as well.
> It is amazing to see the progress made in Submarine last year, the
> community grows fast and quiet collaborative. I can
For more details, see
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-trunk-java8-linux-x86/1034/
[Jan 31, 2019 3:55:29 AM] (sunilg) YARN-9099.
GpuResourceAllocator#getReleasingGpus calculates number of
[Jan 31, 2019 1:51:31 PM] (elek) HDDS-956. MultipartUpload: List Parts for a
Multipart upload key.
16 matches
Mail list logo
