Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.10.0 (RC1)

2019-10-29 Thread Jonathan Hung
+1 from me too. The vote passed, so I'll continue with the rest of the release. Thanks everyone! Jonathan Hung On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:40 PM Giovanni Matteo Fumarola < giovanni.fumar...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > > - Built from source on Ubuntu with OpenJDK 11.0.3 > - Verified s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.10.0 (RC1)

2019-10-29 Thread Giovanni Matteo Fumarola
+1 (non-binding). - Built from source on Ubuntu with OpenJDK 11.0.3 - Verified signatures - Verified documentation - Setup up a single node cluster and ran basic yarn commands - Ran UTs for Yarn Router, Yarn Common, Yarn API, YARN NM and YARN RM. Thanks for putting this together, Jonathan. On Tu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.10.0 (RC1)

2019-10-29 Thread Dinesh Chitlangia
+1 (non-binding) - Verified signatures - Verified documentation - Built from sources on CentOS 7 - Tested with basic hdfs commands on a single node setup. Thank for organizing the release, Jonathan. -Dinesh On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:45 AM epa...@apache.org wrote: > Compatibility testing has

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.10.0 (RC1)

2019-10-29 Thread epa...@apache.org
Compatibility testing has gone well for me. - In a 4-node cluster, I ran YARN rolling upgrade tests between 2.8.5 and 2.10.0 - In a 4-node cluster, I ran YARN rolling upgrade tests between 2.10.0 and trunk - With one 4-node cluster running 2.10.0 and one 4-node cluster running trunk, I ran a wo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.10.0 (RC0)

2019-10-29 Thread epa...@apache.org
Jonathan, I actually did all my testing on RC1. Sorry for the confusion. I'll respond on the RC1 thread. -Eric On Monday, October 28, 2019, 8:00:20 PM CDT, Jonathan Hung wrote: Thanks Eric! I sent out an RC1 earlier last week, not sure if you saw that. The only diff between RC1 and RC0 is

Apache Hadoop qbt Report: branch2+JDK7 on Linux/x86

2019-10-29 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
For more details, see https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-qbt-branch2-java7-linux-x86/489/ No changes -1 overall The following subsystems voted -1: asflicense findbugs hadolint pathlen unit xml The following subsystems voted -1 but were configured to be filtered/ignored: cc check

Re: [VOTE] create ozone-dev and ozone-issues mailing lists

2019-10-29 Thread Elek, Marton
> The immediate problem we need to fix is to prevent github updates from > spamming the dev mailing list. > Might make sense to just have a separate issues@ mailing list and point > github to that? For me, it's less confusing to create both of the issues and the dev list at the same time. Just