at 1:18 PM Eric Badger wrote:
> If we're not using patches on JIRA anymore, why are we using JIRA at all?
> Why don't we just use GitHub Issues? Using JIRA to then redirect to GitHub
> seems unintuitive and will fracture the information between two different
> places. Do the conversa
If we're not using patches on JIRA anymore, why are we using JIRA at all?
Why don't we just use GitHub Issues? Using JIRA to then redirect to GitHub
seems unintuitive and will fracture the information between two different
places. Do the conversations happen on JIRA or on a GitHub PR? Having
+1
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 6:14 AM Surendra Singh Lilhore <
surendralilh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Surendra
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:31 PM tom lee wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Masatake Iwasaki 于2021年6月3日周四 下午5:43写道:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Masatake Iwasaki
> > >
> > >
Hello all,
I'd like to gauge the community on the usage of lambdas within Hadoop code.
I've been reviewing a lot of patches recently that either add or modify
lambdas and I'm beginning to think that sometimes we, as a community, are
writing lambdas because we can rather than because we should. To
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-7324:
--
Summary: ClientHSSecurityInfo class is in wrong META-INF file
Key: MAPREDUCE-7324
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7324
Project: Hadoop Map
I've committed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10540. Xiaoqiao,
feel free to cherry-pick this into the 3.2.2 release branch if you think it
is relevant.
Also, can someone tell me which releases we should be targeting? Currently
these versions are all Unreleased on JIRA:
3.4.1, 3.4.0
Hi Xiaoqiao,
I believe that
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commit/3274fd139d9b612e449fc234f8804a2a97ae6c47
broke compilation for branch-3.2. Looks like you missed a 3.2.2 -> 3.2.3 in
pom.xml in the top-level directory.
Hi,
Could I get some people to review this JIRA? It is a large patch and
touches a lot of files. Additionally, it makes some incompatible changes,
notably changing the names of config keys.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17169
Eric
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on RHEL 7
- Deployed a single node pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Only minor thing is that the DockerLinuxContainerRuntime won't run in a
secure environment using kerberos and nscd because there is no way to
Congrats, Jim! Well-deserved and much overdue!
Eric
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 11:38 AM epa...@apache.org wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that Jim Brennan has accepted the invitation to
> become a Hadoop committer focusing on the YARN space.
>
> Please reach out to Jim and welcome him in his new
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-7285:
--
Summary: Junit class missing from
hadoop-mapreduce-client-jobclient-*-tests jar
Key: MAPREDUCE-7285
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7285
+1 (binding)
- Built from source on RHEL 7.6
- Deployed on a single-node cluster
- Verified DefaultContainerRuntime
- Verified RuncContainerRuntime (after setting things up with the
docker-to-squash tool available on YARN-9564)
Eric
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-7277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eric Badger reopened MAPREDUCE-7277:
> IndexCache totalMemoryUsed differs from cache conte
Hi Runlin,
Awesome to hear that you've been able to upgrade! Do you mind sharing some
thoughts on your experience with the upgrade? Did you take a cluster
downtime to do the upgrade? How long did the upgrade take? Did you find any
incompatibilities or issues during or after the upgrade? Do you
Hello all,
Is it written anywhere what the difference is between a minor release and a
point/dot/maintenance (I'll use "point" from here on out) release? I have
looked around and I can't find anything other than some compatibility
documentation in 2.x that has since been removed in 3.x [1] [2]. I
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for putting this RC together. You stated that there are improvements
related to rolling upgrades from 2.x to 3.x and I know I have seen multiple
JIRAs getting committed to that effect. Could you describe any tests that
you have done to verify rolling upgrade compatibility for
tegy? It should be OK to remove/add optional
> > fields (removing the field with id 12, and adding the field with id 13).
> > The difficulties I see here are, we would have to leave id 12 blank in
> > 2.8.6 (so we cannot have YARN-6164 in branch-2.8), and users on 2.8.4/5
> > w
From: Jonathan Hung
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 11:38 AM
> To: Eric Badger
> Cc: Hadoop Common; yarn-dev; mapreduce-dev; Hdfs-dev
> Subject: Re: Incompatible changes between branch-2.8 and branch-2.9
>
> Hi Eric, thanks for the investigation.
>
> * For YARN-661
We (Verizon Media) are currently moving towards upgrading our clusters from
our internal fork of branch-2.8 to an internal fork of branch-2. During
this process, we have found multiple incompatible changes in protobufs
between branch-2.8 and branch-2. These incompatibilities were all
introduced
- Stuff has been going into branch-2 sporadically but I don't who is
actively
using that code other than as part of a cherrypick backwards strategy.
- Should we do a 2.10.x release? Or just say "time to upgrade?"
We have talked at a few different Hadoop contributors meetups and community
syncs
+1
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:40 AM Sean Busbey
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:03 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> > and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
> >
> > This discussion runs
Where would JIRA fit into the PR workflow? Would we file JIRAs just to
track github PRs and have all of the discussion on the PR?
Eric
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:10 PM Dinesh Chitlangia
wrote:
> +1 Absolutely. It also makes it easy/clean for reviewers to leave specific
> comments and the
Is there a YARN call today (in 16 minutes)? I saw it on the calendar until
a few minutes ago.
Eric
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:18 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Thanks @Wei-Chiu Chuang . updated gdoc
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:35 PM Wei-Chiu Chuang
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Wangda,
> >
> > I just like
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on RHEL 7
- Deployed a single node pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
- Verified the Docker environment works with non-entrypoint mode
Eric
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:42 AM Sunil G wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> Thanks to
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.14.1, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Eric
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:02 AM Ayush Saxena wrote:
> Sunil, Thanks for driving this release!!!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
> -Built from
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.13.6, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Eric
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Gabor Bota wrote:
> Thanks for the work Junping!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - checked out git
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.13.6, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 8:46 AM, Shashikant Banerjee <
sbaner...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> +1(non-binding)
>
> * checked out git tag
My thinking is to cut the branch in next couple of days and create RC for
vote at the end of month.
> We plan to cut branch-3.0.3 by the coming Wednesday (May 9th) and vote
for RC on May 30th
I much prefer to wait to cut the branch until just before the production
of the release and the vote.
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.13.4, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Eric
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 11:16 PM, Takanobu Asanuma
wrote:
> Thanks for working on this, Sammi!
>
> +1
Thanks, Konstantin. Everything looks good to me
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all signatures and digests
- Built from source on macOS 10.12.6, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Eric
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Jason Lowe wrote:
>
Thanks, Junping
+1 (non-binding) looks good from my end
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.12.6, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Eric
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
wrote:
>
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.12.6, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Thanks,
Eric
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Carlo Aldo Curino
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Nov 15, 2017 8:23
+1 (non-binding) pending the issue that Sunil/Rohith pointed out
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.12.6, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Thanks,
Eric
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Wangda Tan wrote:
>
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all hashes and checksums
- Built from source on macOS 10.12.6, Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed a pseudo cluster
- Ran some example jobs
Thanks,
Eric
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh
wrote:
> Thanks Junping,
>
> +1 (non-binding)
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified all checksums and signatures
- Built native from source on macOS 10.12.6 and RHEL 7.1
- Deployed a single node pseudo cluster
- Ran pi and sleep jobs
- Verified Docker was marked as experimental
Thanks,
Eric
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 1:41 PM, John Zhuge
+1 definitely think an official Hadoop docker image (possibly 1 per major
or minor release) would be a positive both for contributors and for users
of Hadoop.
Eric
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Wangda Tan wrote:
> +1 to add Hadoop docker image for easier testing /
- Verified all checksums signatures
- Built from src on macOS 10.12.6 with Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed single node pseudo cluster
- Successfully ran sleep and pi jobs
- Navigated the various UIs
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Eric
On Wednesday, August 2, 2017 12:31 PM, Chris Douglas
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-6927:
--
Summary: MR job should only set tracking url if history was
successfully written
Key: MAPREDUCE-6927
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6927
- Verified all checksums signatures
- Built from src on macOS 10.12.5 with Java 1.8.0u65
- Deployed single node pseudo cluster
- Successfully ran sleep and pi jobs
- Navigated the various UIs
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Eric
On Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:31 PM, Aaron Fabbri
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-6911:
--
Summary:
TestMapreduceConfigFields.testCompareXmlAgainstConfigurationClass fails
consistently
Key: MAPREDUCE-6911
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6911
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-6882:
--
Summary: Increase MapReduce test timeouts from 1 second to 10
seconds
Key: MAPREDUCE-6882
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6882
Project
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified checksums and signatures of all files
- Built from source on MacOS Sierra via JDK 1.8.0 u65
- Deployed single-node cluster
- Successfully ran a few sample jobs
Thanks,
Eric
On Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:56 PM, John Zhuge wrote:
+1. Thanks
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified signatures and md5- Built from source- Started single-node cluster
on my mac- Ran some sleep jobs
Eric
On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 4:32 PM, Yufei Gu wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for working on this.
+1 (Non-Binding)
1. Downloaded the
PM, Allen Wittenauer
<a...@effectivemachines.com> wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Eric Badger <ebad...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>
> wrote:
>
>
> WARNING: log4j.properties is not found. HADOOP_CONF_DIR may be incomplete.
^^
>
>
wed a successful job, but as you
can see, I did not have anything printed onto the command line. Hopefully this
is just a misconfiguration on my part, but I figured that I would point it out
just in case.
Thanks,
Eric
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 4:00 PM, Eric Badger
<ebad...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALI
All on OSX 10.11.6:
Verified the hashes. However, Andrew, I don't know where to find your public
key, so I wasn't able to verify that they were signed by you.Built from
sourceDeployed a pseudo-distributed clusterRan a few sample jobsPoked around
the RM UIPoked around the attached website
+1 non-binding
All on OSX 10.11.6:Verified signatures of source and binary tarballsCompiled
from sourceDeployed pseudo clusterRan sample jobs
Thanks,
Eric
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 1:26 PM, Xuan Gong
wrote:
+1 Binding.
Built from source code.
Deployed single
* Verified mds and pgp signatures of both source and binary* Built tarball from
source on OS X 10.11.6 (El Capitan)* Deployed in pseudo-distributed mode* Ran
sleep jobs and other randomly selected tests on both MapReduce and Tez*
Visually verified the RM and history server UIs
Thanks,
Eric
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-6744:
--
Summary: Increase timeout on TestDFSIO tests
Key: MAPREDUCE-6744
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6744
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-6649:
--
Summary: getFailureInfo not returning any failure info
Key: MAPREDUCE-6649
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6649
Project: Hadoop Map/Reduce
Eric Badger created MAPREDUCE-6630:
--
Summary: TestUserGroupInformation#testGetServerSideGroups fails in
chroot
Key: MAPREDUCE-6630
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-6630
Project
51 matches
Mail list logo