With four committer +1s, this vote passes.
I'll take care of merging this to trunk either later tonight or over the
weekend.
Thanks to all of the contributors who helped with this work!
-Todd
+1
I skimmed over the initial import, but looked at the follow-up patches more
closely. There is very little change to the existing code, most (all?) of
which is already committed to trunk. Ran wordcount with the default
collector and the native collector on a single node setup - the latter
takes
+1
Good performance improvement. Nice work…
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> +1
>
> The change to the existing code is very limited and the perf is
> impressive. -C
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As I've reported recently [1],
+1
The change to the existing code is very limited and the perf is impressive. -C
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As I've reported recently [1], work on the MAPREDUCE-2841 branch has
> progressed well and the development team working on it feels that it is
> read
Hi all,
As I've reported recently [1], work on the MAPREDUCE-2841 branch has
progressed well and the development team working on it feels that it is
ready to be merged into trunk.
For those not familiar with the JIRA (it's a bit lengthy to read from start
to finish!) the goal of this work is to b
