Re: Defects to be committed to 0.20.205 branch

2011-09-07 Thread Arun C Murthy
Hi Venu, Please go ahead and provide patches for them - I'll review. thanks, Arun On Sep 5, 2011, at 9:47 PM, Venu Gopala Rao wrote: > Hi Matt, > > The following defects are important defects encountered by us in our > regular Hadoop usage. We have submitted patches to these defects in th

Re: Defects to be committed to 0.20.205 branch

2011-09-06 Thread Matt Foley
[moving from @mapreduce-dev to @general] Thanks, Venu. I'll look at these, and evaluate the risk/benefit of including them in 205. Have you run them internally in production, or are the patches brand new? Thanks, --Matt On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Venu Gopala Rao < venugopalarao.ko...@huawe

Defects to be committed to 0.20.205 branch

2011-09-05 Thread Venu Gopala Rao
Hi Matt, The following defects are important defects encountered by us in our regular Hadoop usage. We have submitted patches to these defects in the trunk. But some of them are yet to be committed to the trunk. I feel the following defects are worth merging to 0.20.205 branch. We can provide