I couldn't find one so I filed MAPREDUCE-2955.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Is there a jira for that? Seems like most tests wouldn't be MR1 specific.
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Evans wrote:
>> There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just
Thanks for the prompt response Eli. In effect, MRv1 is not supprted in
0.23 onwards, and so LTC should not be patched in those releases. (I
searched the mailing lists, but could not see it said explicitly.)
- Milind
---
Milind Bhandarkar
Greenplum Labs, EMC
(Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this
Is there a jira for that? Seems like most tests wouldn't be MR1 specific.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Evans wrote:
> There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just that the tests
> have not been ported over to use them yet.
>
> --Bobby
>
> On 9/7/11 2:01 PM, "Eli Coll
There is a MiniYarnCluster and a MiniMRYarnCluster, it is just that the tests
have not been ported over to use them yet.
--Bobby
On 9/7/11 2:01 PM, "Eli Collins" wrote:
My understanding is that the MR1 code is currently needed to run the tests
because there is no Mini MR cluster for MR2. So t
My understanding is that the MR1 code is currently needed to run the tests
because there is no Mini MR cluster for MR2. So the code is needed until
the tests can run against MR2 (not sure if there's an effort underway).
However, see MR-2736, if we remove the ability to run the daemons I don't
thin
Folks,
Has the community decided how long MRv1 will remain part of the codebase,
after 0.23 ? The reason I am asking is, for those who are working on
forward porting LinuxTaskController fixes (from 0.20.2xx) to 0.22, will
they have to patch 0.23 and trunk as well ? Or should these branches be
left
