Re: [mapserver-users] POST for WMS - supported

2015-03-04 Thread bte...@gmail.com
In Section 9.2.4 of the MapServer v6.0 Manual, under OGC Support and Configuration / WMS Server / WMS 1.3.0 Support / Some Missing features it lists WMS 1.3.0 Post request should be an XML document containing the different operations and parameters. (Also appears in the current version

[mapserver-users] POST for WMS - supported

2015-03-03 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi all, Are HTTP POST requests supported for WMS GetMap requests? I realise that requests including an SLD are supported... but what about for requests not using an SLD? I'm using MapServer v6.0.3. I've tried to code up the layer name, format, bounds etc as a POSTED request and can't get it to

Re: [mapserver-users] WFS filter creates a query using a number instead of text

2015-03-01 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Thanks Jukka - I'll try your suggestion for OGR connection-type first, since that's easy for me to test on our existing platform. I have tried the PropertyIsLike and that definitely works. It'll take me a little bit longer to spin up a more recent version of the software packages... Regards,

Re: [mapserver-users] WFS filter creates a query using a number instead of text

2015-03-01 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi Jukka - I've tried testing your other suggestion: OK - I've tried using the OGR CONNECTIONTYPE - it no longer generates an error message, but comes back with a null result set. Checking the logs reveals that the error is now apparently being pushed further back up the stack - eg the Postgres

Re: [mapserver-users] WFS filter creates a query using a number instead of text

2015-02-26 Thread bte...@gmail.com
I can't shine any light on the problem but I have encountered the same problem. Using MapServer v6.0.3, with Postgres 9.1.3, PostGIS v 1.5.3, GDAL v1.8.0.WFS Posted Query looks like this:The DescribeFeatureType for that layer shows the following for the attribute:PostgreSQL has the attribute

[mapserver-users] Re: Oracle Locator support

2012-03-01 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Thanks Michael! -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/Oracle-Locator-support-tp4519962p4537982.html Sent from the Mapserver - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ mapserver-users mailing list

[mapserver-users] Re: Oracle Locator support

2012-02-29 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi Michael, Thanks, but I only want to know at this stage whether MapServer is written for Oracle Spatial only, or whether it can support Locator. I'm guessing from reading Oracle's documentation that since SDO.GEOM.INTERSECTS and SDO.GEOM.RELATE aren't supported, that MapServer probably doesn't

[mapserver-users] Re: WMS for netcdf [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-28 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi Kathleen, I've used a CGI Variable to pass a variable in the past, for a similar problem. It does mean that you then use a non-WMS compliant URL query. I used it with a FILTER statement, but perhaps it might also work with a PROCESSING instruction eg. PROCESSING BANDS=%timeband% Your URL

[mapserver-users] Oracle Locator support

2012-02-27 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi, I'm trying to find out if Oracle Locator can be used as an effective Spatial Database for MapServer. I haven't been able to find a list of what is and isn't supported for this combination. We've been using PostgreSQL/PostGIS as our spatial database and are wondering whether a shift to Oracle

[mapserver-users] WFS 1.1.0 Namespace quirk for PropertyName attribute restricting

2011-09-28 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi, I think I've found a quirk in MapServer V5.6.0 WFS behaviour - but I'm not really sure as I don't understand enough about reading an XSD to know whether or not this is expected behaviour. This particular issue is not causing me any grief at the moment as I know the work-around, but perhaps

[mapserver-users] Re: WFS restricting returned attributes

2011-08-25 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi Jukka, Yes - your example works on my own MapServer (v5.6.0) although I had to put the propertynames in parentheses eg. (of course my test had a different URL!) I'm actually using the commercial services of another company - and it's their MapServer that is v5.4.2 (not mine, otherwise I

[mapserver-users] WFS restricting returned attributes

2011-08-24 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi, I'm a user of a service provider that uses MapServer V5.4.2. I'm using their WFS Service. I'm trying to restrict the set of attributes that are returned by using a POST'ed Query in my request. But it doesn't seem to work. The service provider is using V5.4.2. I've tried equivalent queries

[mapserver-users] Re: WFS restricting returned attributes

2011-08-24 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi Jukka, Thanks for your response. Made some progress, but still got some problems. I tried using the the two following GET requests to restrict the property/attribute lists, using the syntax/capitalisation as read from the OGC WFS 1.1.0 recommendation: This example follows: This one follows

[mapserver-users] WFS Client through Proxy and HTTP Authentication

2011-08-09 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Hi, I have MapServer 5.6.0 running on RHEL5.5 (FGS9.5 MapServer package) I'm behind a proxy (NTLM), and I want to access a WFS source outside that requires HTTP Authentication. I'm using a WFS Client setup in my Map file, and I'm accessing my MapServer using WFS too - eg. a WFS Client... all

[mapserver-users] Re: WFS Client through Proxy and HTTP Authentication

2011-08-09 Thread bte...@gmail.com
Thanks Daniel, I can't get the actual IP because I'm behind a proxy, on an intranet. But I know the proxy can correctly resolve the URL, because it works fine when I send a WMS request into my server (which then successfully sends a WMS request back out to the external source.) Likewise if I

[mapserver-users] Re: WFS Client through Proxy and HTTP Authentication

2011-08-09 Thread bte...@gmail.com
will require a cleaner job, but this quick patch should work if you are able to build from source. Daniel On 11-08-09 10:29 PM, bte...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Daniel, I can't get the actual IP because I'm behind a proxy, on an intranet. But I know the proxy can correctly resolve the URL