[mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Sarel Coetzer
Hi Is there anywhere a brief explanation of the deferent types of map services such as WFS, WMS and WCS. What each service does differently then the other and how to identify which one would be the correct service to use for a specific application. I have read the various how to's on the wiki but

Re: [mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Kristian Thy
On Tue, May 13, Sarel Coetzer wrote: Is there anywhere a brief explanation of the deferent types of map services such as WFS, WMS and WCS. WIYF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Map_Service http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Feature_Service http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Coverage_Service

Re: [mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)
Hi Sarel, I can probably explain it in a few sentences. WMS is a web mapping service, so it is meant to render an image of data, be it vector or raster data. It only gives you back an image representation of your data. WFS is a web feature service, it is meant to deliver the features (in

Re: [mapserver-users] To WFS, WMS or to WCS

2008-05-13 Thread Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS)
Hi Sarel, please cc the list since it might be useful for other people searching the archives one day. 1) AFAIK WMS server does not generate any images in the temp dir when using Mapserver in CGI mode. The WMS client in Mapserver does (so if you use remote WMS layers). I don't think WFS and