While I'm glad it works (the regex should execute faster too) the other
expression should
have worked as well. Can you share the data you were using for some
testing?
Steve
On 7/18/2008 at 8:16 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike
Saunt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre
Excellent - that
Steve is right, I had only guessed that there might be a bug based on
the problem description, but we've been unable to reproduce the issue
that you report. I meant to reply on Friday asking for a testcase to
reproduce but I forgot.
Daniel
Steve Lime wrote:
While I'm glad it works (the
