RE: [mapserver-users] Re: Clipping returned WFS data to the requesting bounding box

2010-11-29 Thread Lime, Steve D (DNR)
I'm not aware of any means to do this. If you're using PostGIS perhaps there's a way to use the !BOX! hack in conjunction with some of the analytical functions but it's a long shot... (see http://www.mail-archive.com/mapserver-us...@lists.umn.edu/msg03006.html) Steve -Original Message-

Re: [mapserver-users] Re: Clipping returned WFS data to the requesting bounding box

2010-11-29 Thread Jan Hartmann
On 2010-11-29 22:11, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote: I'm not aware of any means to do this. If you're using PostGIS perhaps there's a way to use the !BOX! hack in conjunction with some of the analytical functions but it's a long shot... (see http://www.mail-archive.com/mapserver-us...@lists.umn.e

RE: [mapserver-users] Re: Clipping returned WFS data to the requesting bounding box

2010-12-01 Thread Lime, Steve D (DNR)
xpressions like this. Steve From: Jan Hartmann [j.l.h.hartm...@uva.nl] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:30 AM To: Lime, Steve D (DNR) Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org Subject: Re: [mapserver-users] Re: Clipping returned WFS data to the requesting b

Re: [mapserver-users] Re: Clipping returned WFS data to the requesting bounding box

2010-12-02 Thread Jan Hartmann
On 2010-12-02 6:04, Lime, Steve D (DNR) wrote: I'd advocate binding a few variables like extent and scale to expressions with a special syntax. For example, [_minx] or something like that. RFC 64 makes it much easier to extend expressions like this. I would certainly like to have that. If