t;> QUERY_STRING="mode=nquery&qformat=UnassignedWells_select_template&map=select2_Test.map&qlayer=UnAssignedWells&"
>>
>> Am I close?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Brent
>>
>>
>>> Yup. What sort of an example would help?
>>>
&
ery&qformat=UnassignedWells_select_template&map=select2_Test.map&qlayer=UnAssignedWells&"
>>
>> Am I close?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Brent
>>
>>
>>> Yup. What sort of an example would help?
>>>
>>> -Original Messa
Frank,
With the new changes, the query takes about 5 minutes (2.5 minutes for
the first pass and 2.5 minutes for the second) to return the 868
records.
Using the old mapogr.c it would take 2.5 minutes (the first pass) + 1
minute/record (the second pass) = 15 hours (est). This is connecting t
Brent Fraser wrote:
Brent Fraser wrote:
Do you think there would be any point in making the changes for OGR (for
my ODBC -> Sql Server connection)? If so, I'll start having a look at
the
code...
Brent
The improvements are limited to native drivers only, principally Oracle
Spatial and PostGIS
e?
Thanks
Brent
> Yup. What sort of an example would help?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brent Fraser [mailto:bfra...@geoanalytic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:18 PM
> To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
> Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [map
d help?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brent Fraser [mailto:bfra...@geoanalytic.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:18 PM
>> To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
>> Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
>> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0,
> Brent Fraser wrote:
>> Do you think there would be any point in making the changes for OGR (for
>> my ODBC -> Sql Server connection)? If so, I'll start having a look at
>> the
>> code...
>>
>> Brent
>>
>>> The improvements are limited to native drivers only, principally Oracle
>>> Spatial and Po
riginal Message-
> From: Brent Fraser [mailto:bfra...@geoanalytic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:18 PM
> To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
> Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
>
> I'd like to gi
Yup. What sort of an example would help?
-Original Message-
From: Brent Fraser [mailto:bfra...@geoanalytic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:18 PM
To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
rom: Brent Fraser [mailto:bfra...@geoanalytic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:34 PM
> To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
> Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
>
>> What kind of templating are you using? The old-style stuf
o:bfra...@geoanalytic.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 3:10 PM
> To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
> Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
>
> The strange thing is the image render is quick (a few seconds), but
2009 3:10 PM
> To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
> Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
>
> The strange thing is the image render is quick (a few seconds), but the
> nquery+mapshape (rectangle) with the processing o
: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
The strange thing is the image render is quick (a few seconds), but the
nquery+mapshape (rectangle) with the processing of the template is several
minutes. And while it opens/reads/closes the template file for each
record(!), I
.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
>
> Do you think there would be any point in making the changes for OGR (for
> my ODBC -> Sql Server connection)? If so, I'll start having a look at the
> code...
>
> Brent
>
Brent Fraser wrote:
Do you think there would be any point in making the changes for OGR (for
my ODBC -> Sql Server connection)? If so, I'll start having a look at the
code...
Brent
The improvements are limited to native drivers only, principally Oracle
Spatial and PostGIS.
Brent,
I believe
[mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brent Fraser
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:55 PM
To: Lime, Steve D (DNR)
Cc: mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [mapserver-users] mapserver 5.6.0, RFC 52 and driver support
Do you think there would be any point in making the
Do you think there would be any point in making the changes for OGR (for
my ODBC -> Sql Server connection)? If so, I'll start having a look at the
code...
Brent
> The improvements are limited to native drivers only, principally Oracle
> Spatial and PostGIS.
>
> Steve
>
> -Original Message---
The improvements are limited to native drivers only, principally Oracle Spatial
and PostGIS.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:mapserver-users-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Brent Fraser
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:48 PM
To: map
18 matches
Mail list logo
