Re: [Maria-developers] Architecture review of MWL#116 "Efficient group commit for binary log"

2010-09-03 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi, Kristian! On Sep 03, Kristian Nielsen wrote: > > >> - If we have consistent commit order, we can think about > >> optimising commit to need only one fsync (for binlog); lost > >> commits in storage engines can then be recovered from the binlog > >> at crash recovery by re-playing against

[Maria-developers] WL#136 New (by Knielsen): Cross-engine consistency for START TRANSACTION WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT

2010-09-03 Thread worklog-noreply
--- WORKLOG TASK -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- TASK...: Cross-engine consistency for START TRANSACTION WITH CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT CREATION DATE..: Fri,

Re: [Maria-developers] Architecture review of MWL#116 "Efficient group commit for binary log"

2010-09-03 Thread Kristian Nielsen
Sergei Golubchik writes: > Hi, Kristian! > > Let's start from the WL description: Thanks for your detailed comments! >> While currently there is no server guarantee to get same commit order >> in engines an binlog (except for the InnoDB prepare_commit_mutex >> hack), there are several reasons w