Hi, jhx1008!
On May 02, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
> Hi, jhx1008!
>
> This also looks very much like a bug to me.
> Could you please report it at mariadb.org/jira ?
Thanks!
Just for the reference - in case anyone on the list is following,
it's https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4470
> On M
Hi, jhx1008!
This also looks very much like a bug to me.
Could you please report it at mariadb.org/jira ?
On May 02, jhx1008 wrote:
> hello
> I have another problem witch seems like a bug(Server version:
> 5.5.5-10.0.2-MariaDB-log MariaDB Server).
> the problem is about the replication for the x
Hi,
On 05/02/2013 06:42 AM, jhx1008 wrote:
Thanks for all the replies, to fix it maybe need a new syntax, does
mariadb has any plan to fix it?
2013-05-02
We'll fix INSERTs (like the one in your example) to work fine by the
next release, and also think about more tricky cases.
-
Giuseppe Maxia writes:
> I was using:
>
> CHANGE MASTER TO master_gtid_pos=1;
> ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual
> that corresponds to your MariaDB server version for the right syntax to use
> near 'master_gtid_pos=1' at line 1
Ok, thanks.
> I will ha
hello
I have another problem witch seems like a bug(Server version:
5.5.5-10.0.2-MariaDB-log MariaDB Server).
the problem is about the replication for the xa transactions when the master
crashed and then restarted.
I know when we do a transaction, the queries will be stored in the binlog
cache,
Thanks for all the replies, to fix it maybe need a new syntax, does mariadb has
any plan to fix it?
2013-05-02
jhx1008 @netease
发件人：Alexander Barkov
发送时间：2013-04-30 13:37
主题：Re: [Maria-developers] is this a bug?
收件人："Jeremy Cole"
抄送："jhx1008","maria-developers"
Hello,
This is definitel
Kristian,
Thanks for your answer.
The reason for the error I mentioned before is that I used a different syntax
which I found in one of the WL.
instead of
CHANGE MASTER TO MASTER_USE_GTID=1;
I was using:
CHANGE MASTER TO master_gtid_pos=1;
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syn
Giuseppe Maxia writes:
> The only documentation I found is the worklog.
Yes, docs will come of course, but they are not written yet. As Pavel
mentioned, there are some changes compared to original design, that were done
as a result of QA to fix some potential issues with the user experience.
>
Hi,
Thanks for the quick answer.
However, neither of the suggested syntax works with the build currently
released.
Moreover, since the commit comment mentions multiple masters, it would be nice
to have some documentation that explains what to expect when using GTID and
multiple masters.
Cheer
This was changed on the way
(http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/10.0-mdev26/revision/3554).
Instead of "CHANGE MASTER TO master_gtid_pos=auto" you need to use
"CHANGE MASTER TO master_use_gtid=1". If you want to actually set
gtid_pos you need to set @@global.gtid_pos.
Pavel
On Wed,
Hi!
I am testing MariaDB 10.0.2, and I am interested in GTID.
The only documentation I found is the worklog.
Without docs at hand, I tried something:
slave1 [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > CHANGE MASTER TO master_gtid_pos='';
ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the
Thank you Kristian.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kristian Nielsen
wrote:
> Pavel Ivanov writes:
>
>> What will happen with MariaDB if sem-sync master is enabled, some
>> transactions is completed, but before it gets any semi-sync acks all
>> slaves get disconnected? Will this transaction be r
Pavel Ivanov writes:
> What will happen with MariaDB if sem-sync master is enabled, some
> transactions is completed, but before it gets any semi-sync acks all
> slaves get disconnected? Will this transaction be rolled back? Or it
> will be left committed basically creating an alternate future?
Hi, Alexander!
Could you report this bug and fix it, please?
On Apr 30, Alexander Barkov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is definitely a bug.
>
> 0x is a MySQL extension, and it's a hybrid thing.
> It can behave as a number and a string depending on context.
>
> Binary log could use the X'' n
Thank you. I need this info to make sure that our tools work properly.
They need to determine which slave is further in the replication
stream than others (which apparently can be achieved by simple
comparison of sequence number) and detect if slaves have alternate
futures. The latter can happen no
Pavel Ivanov writes:
> As I understand GTID is constructed as - id>-. Is it guaranteed that sequence numbers are
> always increasing inside the domain id? So
The intention is that the user/DBA should configure things so that there is
only ever one active master for each domain_id. If this is don
16 matches
Mail list logo
