Hi, Binod!
First: please send questions like this to maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
it's a public mailing list dedicated to MySQL and MariaDB internals, source
code, and related things. I am subscribed, so I'll see you mail there, and you
may be sure I will, because it won't be accidentally
Awesome job!
I note the last tag is mariadb-10.0.10; just wondering if say I fix a bug or
make an improvement (in my case, in oqgraph) and make a pull request against
this repo, what the procedure would be for backporting to 10.0.12 say?
Would the process be as simple as generating a patch from t
Hi, Andrew!
On May 26, Andrew McDonnell wrote:
> Awesome job!
>
> I note the last tag is mariadb-10.0.10; just wondering if say I fix a bug or
> make an improvement (in my case, in oqgraph) and make a pull request against
> this repo, what the procedure would be for backporting to 10.0.12 say?
Y
Hello Sergei,
On 05/25/2014 08:10 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Hi, Alexander!
On May 17, Alexander Barkov wrote:
Hello Monty,
We discussed extracting data in JSON format today,
to make it possible to return data as a single JSON value
(as a result set consisting of a single row and a single c
Hi, Alexander!
On May 26, Alexander Barkov wrote:
> >> SELECT id,name,address FROM users FOR JSON;
> >
> > This can be built on the existing functionality.
> >
> > "FOR JSON" is a result filter, something that gets the result of a
> > query and transforms it into something different, different set
Hi Sergei,
On 05/26/2014 04:48 PM, Sergei Golubchik wrote:
Yes, it's a detail. My point was that we shouldn't have two
implementations for the same feature (arbitrary transformation of the
query result). So either we reuse the code for procedures, or we do a
new implementation and move PROCE
Hi, Anshu!
On May 25, Anshu Avinash wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> You can find my this week's blog entry at
> http://igniting.in/gsoc2014/2014/05/25/coding-things-up/ . I have created a
> branch on launchpad for my work:
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~igniting/maria/maria/revision/4211 . You can
> give yo
hi guys, one question, that maybe at the right time could be answered...
with the new cost model, maybe at explain we could have a new information
about how many time we will expend? and maybe something like, estimate time
/ executed time (via show warnings?)
i will read the patch about this work,
8 matches
Mail list logo
