Hi, Kazuhiko!
On Nov 04, Kazuhiko Shiozaki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> pcre.h is not installed by 'make install' even if MariaDB is built with
> bundled pcre. But pcre.h is referred in one of installed header files like :
>
> include/mysql/private/item_cmpfunc.h:#include "pcre.h"
> /* pcre header file */
>
I have been debugging some test failures seen in Buildbot:
https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-7026
After some debugging, this is what I think is going on. I will refer to
MariaDB 5.5 sources, though the problem is also in 10.0.
InnoDB/XtraDB mutexes are taken in mutex_enter_func() and
Hi guys, i got one question these days and i don't know how to solve...
the question is:
"How to see the queries executing by replication thread?"
i'm thinking about a information schema plugin to see whats is 'queued' in
replication thread, at "master" (write to binlog) and "slave" (executing
fro
Hi Kristian,
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:12:55PM +0100, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> I have been debugging some test failures seen in Buildbot:
>
> https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-7026
>
> After some debugging, this is what I think is going on. I will refer to
> MariaDB 5.5 sources, th
Sergey Vojtovich writes:
>> # First spin wait, hoping to get the mutex without yielding.
>> os_compare_and_swap_ulint(&mutex->waiters, 0, 1);
> Where did you see "os_compare_and_swap_ulint(&mutex->waiters, 0, 1)"?
> FWICS waiters of InnoDB mutex are non-atomic loads/stores.
mutex_enter_func(
Kristian,
thanks for your answers! My comments inline.
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 06:48:18PM +0100, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
> Sergey Vojtovich writes:
>
> >> # First spin wait, hoping to get the mutex without yielding.
> >> os_compare_and_swap_ulint(&mutex->waiters, 0, 1);
> > Where did you se
Sergey Vojtovich writes:
> Never seen this before. InnoDB of 5.5 and InnoDB/XtraDB of 10.0 both have:
>
> UNIV_INTERN
> void
> mutex_set_waiters(
> /*==*/
> ib_mutex_t* mutex, /*!< in: mutex */
> ulint n) /*!< in: value to set */
> {
> volat
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Kristian Nielsen
wrote:
> Nirbhay Choubey writes:
>
> > [NC] You are right, setting both DO_ and IGNORE_ at the same time would
> not
> > make any sense.
> > But I actually followed the pattern of the existing replication, where
> both
> > _do_ and _ignore_
8 matches
Mail list logo
