Re: [Maria-developers] WL40: Notes/questions

2009-10-12 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! Arjen == Arjen Lentz ar...@openquery.com writes: cut Filtering on current database (or on whatever for row-based) might be more feasible, though there would still be the additional overhead of decoding each event before sending to each slave. Arjen Kristian, your comment, while

Re: [Maria-developers] WL40: Notes/questions

2009-10-02 Thread Kristian Nielsen
Arjen Lentz ar...@openquery.com writes: Current - the binlog options prevent things from getting logged locally, which is bad for point-in-time recovery. - the replicate options work on the slave end, so they still get transmitted which is a) slow and b) potential security issue. Yes. So

Re: [Maria-developers] WL40: Notes/questions

2009-10-02 Thread Arjen Lentz
Hi Kristian On 02/10/2009, at 5:22 PM, Kristian Nielsen wrote: Arjen Lentz ar...@openquery.com writes: Current - the binlog options prevent things from getting logged locally, which is bad for point-in-time recovery. - the replicate options work on the slave end, so they still get transmitted

Re: [Maria-developers] WL40: Notes/questions

2009-10-01 Thread Kristian Nielsen
Alexi1952 alexi1...@yandex.ru writes: Hi Alexi! Sorry for the delay in answering, things have been quite busy... With WL36 and WL40 we have: mysqlbinlog options: --database=db --rewrite-db=db_from-db_to --do-table=db.tbl --ignore-table=db.tbl