Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-24 Thread Kristian Nielsen
mari...@biblestuph.com writes: > TEMPORARY TABLE statement that was injected on Slave C? Does setting > sql_log_bin=0 prior to the creation of the temporary table also > prevent the creation of these DROP statements? Well, it should prevent it. (But since it is a bug causing these redundant drop

Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-24 Thread mariadb
(Sending again, as I don't think my original reply went to the list; apologies if I duplicate.) Thank you both, for your helpful responses. > Hello. > >> mari...@biblestuph.com writes: >> >>> I have four servers all running 10.3 as follows: >>> >>> A <=> B => C => D >> >>> and C is a master

Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-24 Thread Daniel Ragle
Thank you both, for your helpful responses. Hello. mari...@biblestuph.com writes: I have four servers all running 10.3 as follows: A <=> B => C => D and C is a master to D. In addition to their actual replicating DBs, all four servers also have a "norep" DB that is used to create tem

Re: [Maria-discuss] gtid and current_pos vs slave_pos

2019-04-24 Thread andrei . elkin
Hello. > mari...@biblestuph.com writes: > >> I have four servers all running 10.3 as follows: >> >>A <=> B => C => D > >> and C is a master to D. In addition to their actual replicating DBs, >> all four servers also have a "norep" DB that is used to create >> temporary tables for local report