Re: Leading blank lines in codeblocks ignored?

2007-01-01 Thread John Gruber
A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 1/1/07 at 2:08 PM: > No, he said a *literal* non-breaking space. The ` ` entity, > in case you didn’t know, is not special; like all entities, it > merely stands for a character that also has a regular character > code: 160 in the ISO-Latin-* encodings and

Revised - Revised 2005 proposal for meta-data

2007-01-01 Thread Andrea Censi
Happy new year! This is the revised revised proposal: http://maruku.rubyforge.org/proposal.md http://maruku.rubyforge.org/proposal.html http://maruku.rubyforge.org/proposal.pdf I wait for comments. -- Andrea Censi "Life is too important to be taken seriously" (Oscar Wilde) Web: http://ww

Re: Revised 2005 proposal for meta-data

2007-01-01 Thread Andrea Censi
On 12/31/06, Sam Angove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/29/06, Andrea Censi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wait for comments. > > Are you wedded to the curly brackets? Just fiancé. I think that it is better for parsing to use the other brackets (less ambiguity). > The way I see it, Markdown

Re: Revised 2005 proposal for meta-data

2007-01-01 Thread Andrea Censi
On 1/1/07, Ian Barland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FWIW, you can simplify this slightly by getting rid of the "might be > escaped" list -- just decree "*any* (punctuation) character might be > escaped" (using a backslash)[^1]. OK > Almost for free, this lets people quote a > space ("\ " would be

Re: Revised 2005 proposal for meta-data

2007-01-01 Thread Ian Barland
> From: "Andrea Censi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 08:10:00 -0500 > Subject: Re: Revised 2005 proposal for meta-data > > I tried to summarize: > > In a paragraph: > - MUST be escaped: \ ` { [(or else they trigger things) > - MIGHT be escaped: > - `+ * -` (only if ambi

Re: Leading blank lines in codeblocks ignored?

2007-01-01 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Andrea Censi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-01 10:10]: > On 12/31/06, John Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrea Censi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/31/06 at 10:12 AM: > > > > > Is there any way in Markdown to indicate a code-block with a leading blank > > > line? > > > > Not really, but y

Re: Leading blank lines in codeblocks ignored?

2007-01-01 Thread Andrea Censi
On 12/31/06, John Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrea Censi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/31/06 at 10:12 AM: > > > Is there any way in Markdown to indicate a code-block with a leading blank > > line? > > Not really, but you could fake it with, say, a literal > non-breaking space. I don't