Re: best way to use emphasis within code?

* Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-04 20:40]: > What I don't like about the above is that it relies entirely on > CSS support by the browser instead of using established and > meaningful tags. +1 Also to all following points. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: best way to use emphasis within code?

Le 2007-01-04 à 12:14, Jeremy C. Reed a écrit : >> And now type this: {$ **mail -u _user_**}{in} and then type >> {$ cd .. }{1} >> >> {1}: style=font-family:fixed > > My problem with that is it is becomming less readable. Agree... but then you could point out that adding ** and _ to the input m

Re: best way to use emphasis within code?

Reply to Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07-01-04 11:14: >I'd hope that dumping most Markdown content in a plain text >reader should be easily and quickly readable. I agree jem ___ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pai

Re: best way to use emphasis within code?

On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Andrea Censi wrote: > > I want to use fixed font like a code block but also use italics and bold > > at same time. > > > > For example in HTML: > > > > $ mail -u user > > Just an idea that strucked me. > If we had a syntax for creating SPANSs, he could write: > > === > And no

Re: best way to use emphasis within code?

On 12/30/06, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to use fixed font like a code block but also use italics and bold > at same time. > > For example in HTML: > > $ mail -u user Just an idea that strucked me. If we had a syntax for creating SPANSs, he could write: === And now type thi

Re: best way to use emphasis within code?

On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > If not, I will code this for my own use. I will attempt to add an option > to Markdown so it doesn't take it literal. > > Or maybe use two "" (two double-quotes) to begin and end the > block. Or start line with "" (two doubel-quotes). This is what

Re: Revised - Revised 2005 proposal for meta-data

Le 2007-01-01 à 19:02, Andrea Censi a écrit : > Happy new year! > > This is the revised revised proposal: > > http://maruku.rubyforge.org/proposal.md > http://maruku.rubyforge.org/proposal.html > http://maruku.rubyforge.org/proposal.pdf > > I wait for comments. Overall seems good, but I want to c

Backslash escapes (was: Revised 2005 proposal for meta-data)

Le 2007-01-01 à 15:25, Andrea Censi a écrit : >> [1] Even further, you could allow non-punctuation to be escaped. > > In a sense, this is the most consinstent way of escaping. Why so? Either you have a fixed list of what you can escape and what you cannot, either you can escape everything. Both