Re: HTML Tags <=> Markdown Quick Reference @ Write Kit

2015-08-05 Thread Scott Granneman
On 5 Aug 2015, at 9:06, Tom Humiston wrote: On Aug 4, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Gerald Bauer wrote: thus, before e.g. less typing They're not equivalent — there's far more difference than the amount of typing, and they ought not be considered interchangeable. _When used as intended, the em and

Re: HTML Tags <=> Markdown Quick Reference @ Write Kit

2015-08-05 Thread Jason Davies
On 5 Aug 2015, at 15:06, Tom Humiston wrote: In short, Gerald, in the guide you're preparing I wouldn't mention and in connection with Markdown's *em* and **strong** syntax, because they're really for something else. not to disagree with your point (but rather to agree: Gruber is careful t

Re: HTML Tags <=> Markdown Quick Reference @ Write Kit

2015-08-05 Thread Tom Humiston
On Aug 4, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Gerald Bauer wrote: > > thus, before e.g. less typing They're not equivalent — there's far more difference than the amount of typing, and they ought not be considered interchangeable. _When used as intended, the em and strong units are almost always preferable ov

Re: HTML Tags <=> Markdown Quick Reference @ Write Kit

2015-08-05 Thread Gerald Bauer
Hello, Thanks. Sorry my mistake. > Shouldn't it be ? There's no such thing as in HTML. It's now corrected to . Cheers. ___ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net https://pairlist6.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discus