On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Eric Astor wrote:
[...]
Well - has anyone else looked into ANTLR 3.0 at all? The LL(*)
grammar language it uses (an EBNF) allows for full backtracking
support, and unspecified lookahead as far as necessary. It's fairly
well-optimized, as I understand it, takin
On 9/3/07, Allan Odgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Eric Astor wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > Well - has anyone else looked into ANTLR 3.0 at all? The LL(*)
> > grammar language it uses (an EBNF) allows for full backtracking
> > support, and unspecified lookahead as far as n