Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-31 Thread John Gruber
Ken Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/31/06 at 6:34 PM: > 403 Forbidden, for me just now. My bad. That should have been: http://daringfireball.net/projects/downloads/Markdown_1.0.2b7.tbz -J.G. ___ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six

Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-31 Thread Ken Scott
403 Forbidden, for me just now. On 12/31/06, John Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/31/06 at 3:50 PM: > > > For that matter, the current beta build of Markdown.pl is no > > longer available from the site either; all links I tried are 404. > > Try: > >

Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-31 Thread John Gruber
A. Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/31/06 at 3:50 PM: > For that matter, the current beta build of Markdown.pl is no > longer available from the site either; all links I tried are 404. Try: http://daringfireball.net/projects/download_files/Markdown_1.0.2b7.tbz -J.G. ___

Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-31 Thread John Gruber
Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/31/06 at 8:48 AM: > Indeed it is. The online document was reverted to an older > version at some point in early 2006 or late 2005. I attached > to this email the more up-to-date document from March 2005 > when I translated it [in French][fr] and kept a

Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-31 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-31 14:50]: > The online document was reverted to an older version at some > point in early 2006 or late 2005. For that matter, the current beta build of Markdown.pl is no longer available from the site either; all links I tried are 404. Regards, -- A

Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-31 Thread Michel Fortin
Le 2006-12-31 à 4:24, Andrea Censi a écrit : > So the spaces around the single "`" disappear? They do. The spaces around anything in a code span disappear; unfortunately the only reference for this is John's implementation however. And it still makes sense even if you ignore the issue of put

Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-31 Thread Andrea Censi
On 12/31/06, John Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless I'm forgetting something, the documentation is wrong. Or, > more specifically, it is outdated. The idea is that there are no > escapes in code spans. Just like with code blocks, the contents > are treated literally. That means the only ch

Re: Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-30 Thread John Gruber
Andrea Censi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/30/06 at 11:13 AM: > Consider the input: > --- > `There is a literal backtick (\`) here.` > > `There is a literal backtick (\\`) here.` > > ``There is a literal backtick (`) here.`` > --- > > The documentation says that line 2 and 3 are equivalent. >

Escaping inside code blocks?

2006-12-30 Thread Andrea Censi
I am doing unit-tests for Maruku and every once in a while I run into some doubts. I am posting a lot to the list, but all of these messages should be in-topic (tell me if not). Consider the input: --- `There is a literal backtick (\`) here.` `There is a literal backtick (\\`) here.` ``There is