In New England, there's a restaurant chain called Bickford's.
Their motto is "Breakfast anytime." Short, simple, to the point.
(And now I want some pancakes, darn it!)
What about "Data anywhere, any time"?
-Joan
- Original Message -
From: "Noah Slater"
To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org
S
Okay, so a while ago we had this discussion about what CouchDB's "why"
was. i.e. What's our purpose.
There are three questions we can answer, at various points in our
marketing material:
Why? - What's our shared goal?
How? - How are we working towards it?
What? - What are the particulars of that
I think I read something recently that there's more mobile than web app
development happening these days, so "web" might end up sounding outdated.
Random input:
"Synchronicity" is a word we're using to differentiate couchdb-style dbs from
others. Feel free to reuse or take inspiration from that
Will repeat myself on IRC:
"A database for the web" isn't good one since PouchDB is eventually
more "database for the web" than CouchDB now.
We need something more fresh, unique and collision safe as like as
"Time to relax!" was - it's hard to associate any other database with
the same motto.
--
,
Coming out of the logo discussion, it seems 2.0 may be the
right time to consider a new motto, replacing "Time to relax."
PouchDB is "The database that syncs."
On http://couchdb.apache.org/ today, "A database for the web"
is the most prominent motto, bigger than "Relax."
Jan and I will be on sta
Yup, that's fine. +1.
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Wenk"
To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org
Cc: d...@couchdb.apache.org, "Noah Slater" , "Joan Touzet"
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 11:33:16 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Naming releases
yes +1
On 30 October 2014 16:27, Paul Davis
> On 30 Oct 2014, at 17:37 , Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Jan/Lena, could you expand a little on why you don't like the idea of
> dedicating a release?
I fear that someone who built a significant feature for a release would
feel they need recognition as well, but they don’t because they aren’t
reflec
Jan/Lena, could you expand a little on why you don't like the idea of
dedicating a release?
I'm thinking it would be a small para at the bottom of the release
announcement, something like this:
"This release is dedicated to the following advocates as a thank you
for helping grow the community: Al
Also like all of them, except
>> - Have a release dedicated to you
I'd rather avoid that, as it sets the reward at a wrong place, imo.
>> - Name the weekly news
My main issue with this is that I fear running into discussions what is
appropriate as a name (in terms of our bylaws and CoC (which
I like them al except “Have a release dedicated to you” :)
> On 30 Oct 2014, at 16:41 , Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to set up the following rewards. Please review. If nobody
> objects to this email, I will assume consensus.
>
> Lena, a few of these relate to the weekly news, so
I'm thinking the "Hall of Fame'"/ADVOCATES thing might be better just
using the existing THANKS file.
On 30 October 2014 16:41, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to set up the following rewards. Please review. If nobody
> objects to this email, I will assume consensus.
>
> Lena, a few of t
Hello,
I'd like to set up the following rewards. Please review. If nobody
objects to this email, I will assume consensus.
Lena, a few of these relate to the weekly news, so I'm hoping you can
look it over specifically in case you have any objections or
suggestions for improvement!
- #FollowFrida
yes +1
On 30 October 2014 16:27, Paul Davis wrote:
> +1 to the dedication idea
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > (Moving the rest of this discussion to the marketing@ list.)
> >
> > On 30 October 2014 16:25, Noah Slater wrote:
> >> If nobody objects, I'm going to ass
+1 to the dedication idea
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> (Moving the rest of this discussion to the marketing@ list.)
>
> On 30 October 2014 16:25, Noah Slater wrote:
>> If nobody objects, I'm going to assume consensus that "dedicating" a
>> release to an individual is ok
(Moving the rest of this discussion to the marketing@ list.)
On 30 October 2014 16:25, Noah Slater wrote:
> If nobody objects, I'm going to assume consensus that "dedicating" a
> release to an individual is okay if it takes the form of a footnote.
>
> On 28 October 2014 17:21, Noah Slater wrote:
If nobody objects, I'm going to assume consensus that "dedicating" a
release to an individual is okay if it takes the form of a footnote.
On 28 October 2014 17:21, Noah Slater wrote:
> (Re-copying dev@ here too.)
>
> Nope. Nobody is donating anything. This would be a reward that CouchDB
> advocat
16 matches
Mail list logo
